End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs.

PURPOSE To summarize the end points used by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve new cancer drug applications over the last 13 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS The FDA granted marketing approval to 71 oncology drug applications between January 1, 1990, and November 1, 2002. The end points used as the approval basis for each application are presented, and the rationale for each end point is discussed. RESULTS The FDA grants either regular marketing approval or accelerated marketing approval for oncology drug applications. Regular approval is based on end points that demonstrate that the drug provides a longer life, a better life, or a favorable effect on an established surrogate for a longer life or a better life. Accelerated approval (AA) is based on a surrogate end point that is less well established but that is reasonably likely to predict a longer or a better life. Tumor response was the approval basis in 26 of 57 regular approvals, supported by relief of tumor-specific symptoms in nine of these 26 regular approvals. Relief of tumor-specific symptoms provided critical support for approval in 13 of 57 regular approvals. Approval was based on tumor response in 12 of 14 AAs. CONCLUSION End points other than survival were the approval basis for 68% (39 of 57) of oncology drug marketing applications granted regular approval and for all 14 applications granted accelerated approval from January 1, 1990, to November 1, 2002.

[1]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  R. Justice FDA Role in Cancer Drug Development and Requirements for Approval , 1997 .

[3]  R. Temple,et al.  Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. , 1985, Cancer treatment reports.

[4]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[5]  L. Norton Kinetic concepts in the systemic drug therapy of breast cancer. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[6]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  L. Norton A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth. , 1988, Cancer research.

[8]  R. Wittes,et al.  Commentary concerning demonstration of safety and efficacy of investigational anticancer agents in clinical trials. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. DeMets,et al.  Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  P. Schein The case for a new national program for the development of cancer therapeutics. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.