The Human Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Samples Visual Space Differently From Other Face-Selective Regions.

Neuroimaging studies show that ventral face-selective regions, including the fusiform face area (FFA) and occipital face area (OFA), preferentially respond to faces presented in the contralateral visual field (VF). In the current study we measured the VF response of the face-selective posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). Across 3 functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, participants viewed face videos presented in different parts of the VF. Consistent with prior results, we observed a contralateral VF bias in bilateral FFA, right OFA (rOFA), and bilateral human motion-selective area MT+. Intriguingly, this contralateral VF bias was absent in the bilateral pSTS. We then delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over right pSTS (rpSTS) and rOFA, while participants matched facial expressions in both hemifields. TMS delivered over the rpSTS disrupted performance in both hemifields, but TMS delivered over the rOFA disrupted performance in the contralateral hemifield only. These converging results demonstrate that the contralateral bias for faces observed in ventral face-selective areas is absent in the pSTS. This difference in VF response is consistent with face processing models proposing 2 functionally distinct pathways. It further suggests that these models should account for differences in interhemispheric connections between the face-selective areas across these 2 pathways.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  A functional dissociation of face-, body- and scene-selective brain areas based on their response to moving and static stimuli , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Magdalena W. Sliwinska,et al.  TMS demonstrates that both right and left superior temporal sulci are important for facial expression recognition , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Superior Temporal Sulcus Is Causally Connected to the Amygdala: A Combined TBS-fMRI Study , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Galit Yovel,et al.  A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing. , 2015, Annual review of vision science.

[5]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A Retinotopic Basis for the Division of High-Level Scene Processing between Lateral and Ventral Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Kendrick N. Kay,et al.  Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2015, Current Biology.

[7]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  Lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in human superior temporal sulcus , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The Causal Role of the Occipital Face Area (OFA) and Lateral Occipital (LO) Cortex in Symmetry Perception , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Andrew Meade,et al.  Detecting Regular Sound Changes in Linguistics as Events of Concerted Evolution , 2015, Current Biology.

[10]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Combined TMS and fMRI Reveal Dissociable Cortical Pathways for Dynamic and Static Face Perception , 2014, Current Biology.

[11]  David Pitcher,et al.  Facial Expression Recognition Takes Longer in the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus than in the Occipital Face Area , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Freiwald.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of A preference for contralateral stimuli in human object- and face-selective cortex. , 2013 .

[13]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  White-Matter Connectivity between Face-Responsive Regions in the Human Brain , 2012 .

[14]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia with spared within-class object recognition but impaired recognition of degraded basic-level objects , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Superior Facial Expression, But Not Identity Recognition, in Mirror-Touch Synesthesia , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30 , 2011, Cognition.

[19]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in their commonly experienced configurations , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry reveals reduced grey matter volume in the temporal cortex of developmental prosopagnosics , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[24]  J. Schultz,et al.  Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  D. Pitcher,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Disrupts the Perception and Embodiment of Facial Expressions , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Preference for Contralateral Stimuli in Human Object- and Face-Selective Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[28]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The BOLD signal in the amygdala does not differentiate between dynamic facial expressions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[29]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Electrophysiological studies on human pain perception , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Dynamic perception of facial affect and identity in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral Cortex.

[33]  D. Amaral,et al.  Some observations on cortical inputs to the macaque monkey amygdala: An anterograde tracing study , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  D. Amaral,et al.  Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: A retrograde tracing study , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[44]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  S. Rauch,et al.  Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Perrett,et al.  A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust , 1997, Nature.

[47]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical projections of area V2 in the macaque. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[51]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[53]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[54]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  A. Young,et al.  Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[57]  R. E. Passingham,et al.  Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) , 1980, Brain Research.

[58]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face. , 1978, Science.

[59]  P. Ekman,et al.  Measuring facial movement , 1976 .

[60]  F. Wolohan.  Experimental Brain Research , 2013 .

[61]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.