The Behavioural Relationships Between Industrial R&D and University R&D in India

During the years, a large number of formal studies have presented evidences of a positive impact of university R&D on firm performance in general and on the location of industrial R&D, in particular. The question is does it also work the other way around? Does industrial R&D function as an attractor for university R&D? What are the behavioural relationships between industrial R&D and university R&D and vice versa? The authors argue that spatial proximity should be measured using accessibility measures. Fur-thermore, accessibility measures can be used to model interaction opportunities at dif-ferent spatial scales: local, intra-regional and inter-regional. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to analyse the locational relationship between industry R&D and university R&D in India using a simultaneous equation approach. The authors' results indicate that the location of industrial R&D is quite sensitive to the location of university R&D, and that the location of university R&D is sensitive to the location of industrial R&D.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[3]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  K. Train.  Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand , 1985 .

[5]  D. Harhoff.  R&D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, and Productivity Growth — Evidence from German Panel Data , 2000 .

[6]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[7]  G. Untiedt,et al.  Evidence on the Geographic Concentration of German Industries: Do High-Tech Clusters Really Matter? , 2003 .

[8]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[9]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[10]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[12]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[14]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[15]  M. Fischer,et al.  Networks for Process Innovation by Firms:Conjectures from Observationsin Three Countries , 1992 .

[16]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[18]  B. Johansson,et al.  Patterns of a Network Economy , 1994 .

[19]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge complementarity and innovation , 1994 .

[20]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[21]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[22]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Globalizing Learning Economy , 2002 .

[25]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[27]  Ǻ. Andersson,et al.  A Dynamic Input-Output Model with Endogenous Technical Change , 1994 .

[28]  P. McCann,et al.  Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks? , 2000, Urban Studies.

[29]  Bart Verspagen.  Large Firms and Knowledge Flows in the Dutch R&D System : A Case Study of Philips Electronics , 1998 .

[30]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[31]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[32]  James D. Adams,et al.  Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers , 2001 .

[33]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[34]  Wilbur Chung,et al.  Chapters School of Hotel Administration Collection 10-2001 Agglomeration Effects and Performance : A Test of the Texas Lodging Industry , 2015 .

[35]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[36]  Dietmar Harhoff.  Unternehmensgründungen - Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer , 1997 .

[37]  Kiyoshi Kobayashi,et al.  Knowledge, Nodes and Networks: An Analytical Perspective , 1989 .

[38]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  The Anchor Tenant Hypothesis: Exploring the Role of Large, Local, R&D-Intensive Firms in Regional Innovation Systems , 2003 .

[39]  Myriam Mariani,et al.  Next to Production or to Technological Clusters? The Economics and Management of R&D Location , 1999 .

[40]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[41]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry , 1986 .

[42]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  Science-Technology Linkages in an Emerging Research Platform: The Case of Combinatorial Chemistry and Biology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[43]  B. Johansson,et al.  A Simultaneous Model of Long-Term Regional Job and Population Changes , 2019, The Economics of Disappearing Distance.

[44]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[45]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in a Spatial Context — A Critical Review and Assessment , 2001 .

[46]  J. Cantwell.  The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? , 1995 .

[47]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[48]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .

[49]  C. Karlsson.  From Knowledge and Technology Networks to Network Technology , 1994 .

[50]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .

[51]  Eric A. Nerlinger,et al.  Standorte und Entwicklung junger innovativer Unternehmen : empirische Ergebnisse für West-Deutschland , 1998 .

[52]  Alfred D. Chandler,et al.  The Dynamic Firm , 1999 .

[53]  B. Johansson,et al.  Time distances and labor market integration , 2002 .

[54]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[55]  M. Spence.  Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[57]  Richard Florida,et al.  Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development , 1999 .

[58]  R. Cornes,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. 2nd. ed. , 1996 .

[59]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Kiyoshi Kobayashi,et al.  Knowledge Network and Market Structure: An Analytical Perspective , 1995 .

[61]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: the Tale of University Licensing , 1998 .

[62]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[63]  B. Johansson.  Parsing the Menagerie of Agglomeration and Network Externalities , 2004 .

[64]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[65]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and knowledge management , 2004 .

[66]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[67]  Richard Harris,et al.  The knowledge‐based economy: intellectual origins and new economic perspectives , 2001 .

[68]  N. Dorfman,et al.  Route 128 : The Development of a Regional High Technology Economy : Research Policy , 1983 .

[69]  Luc Soete.  The new economy, a European perspective , 2001 .

[70]  Franz-Josef Bade,et al.  The spatial distribution of new technology-based firms: Empirical results for West-Germany , 2000 .

[71]  Richard Florida,et al.  The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA , 1997 .

[72]  Morgan Kelly,et al.  Marshallian Externalities in Innovation , 1999 .

[73]  A. Macpherson,et al.  Academic-industry linkages and small firm innovation: evidence from the scientific instruments sector , 1998 .

[74]  Martin Andersson,et al.  The role of accessibility for regional innovation systems , 2002 .

[75]  R. Bingham,et al.  Dilemmas of urban economic development : issues in theory and practice , 1997 .

[76]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[77]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[78]  M. Wright,et al.  Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom , 2003 .