Impact of Spodoptera frugiperda neonate pretreatment conditions on Vip3Aa19 insecticidal protein activity and laboratory bioassay variation

Abstract BACKGROUND Variation in response to insecticidal proteins is common upon repetition of insect bioassays. Understanding this variation is a prerequisite to detecting biologically important differences. We tracked neonate Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) susceptibility to Vip3Aa19 over 17 generations using standardized bioassay methods. Five larval pretreatment conditions and one bioassay condition were tested to determine whether susceptibility was affected. These included: storage time; prefeeding; storage at reduced temperature; storage at reduced humidity; colony introgression of field‐collected individuals. Extremes of photoperiod during the bioassay itself were also examined. RESULTS LC50 values for two strains of S. frugiperda varied 6.6‐fold or 8.8‐fold over 17 generations. Storage time and humidity had no impact on Vip3Aa19 susceptibility, whereas prefeeding significantly reduced subsequent mortality (by 27%). Storage at reduced temperature increased mortality for one colony (from 45.6 to 73.0%) but not for the other. Introgression of field‐collected individuals affected susceptibility at the first generation but not for subsequent generations. A 24 h bioassay photophase significantly reduced susceptibility (by 26%) for both colonies. CONCLUSION Certain pretreatment and bioassay conditions were identified that can affect S. frugiperda Vip3Aa19 susceptibility, but innate larval heterogeneity was also present. Our observations should help to increase the consistency of insecticidal protein bioassay results. © 2015 Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

[1]  Rodrigo J. Sorgatto,et al.  Field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize by Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil , 2014 .

[2]  A. Crespo,et al.  Fitness costs of Cry1F resistance in fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda , 2014 .

[3]  D. Amado,et al.  Baseline Susceptibility and Monitoring of Brazilian Populations of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Vip3Aa20 Insecticidal Protein , 2014, Journal of economic entomology.

[4]  A. Raybould,et al.  Nontarget organism effects tests on eCry3.1Ab and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of Event 5307 maize , 2014, Transgenic Research.

[5]  A. M. Vélez,et al.  Inheritance of Cry1F resistance, cross-resistance and frequency of resistant alleles in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 2013, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[6]  A. Raybould,et al.  Characterising microbial protein test substances and establishing their equivalence with plant-produced proteins for use in risk assessments of transgenic crops , 2012, Transgenic Research.

[7]  B. Siegfried,et al.  Bt Resistance Monitoring in European Corn Borers and Western Corn Rootworms , 2012 .

[8]  S. Caccia,et al.  Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda and S. exigua to Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa insecticidal protein. , 2012, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[9]  R. Luttrell,et al.  Susceptibility of Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Vip3A insecticidal protein expressed in VipCot™ cotton. , 2011, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[10]  B. Siegfried,et al.  Susceptibility of European and North American populations of the European corn borer to the Cry1F insecticidal protein , 2011 .

[11]  A. Morey,et al.  Novel Vip3A Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize approaches high-dose efficacy against Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under field conditions: Implications for resistance management , 2010, GM crops.

[12]  F. Gould,et al.  Response of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Strains to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Incorporated into Different Insect Artificial Diets , 2009, Journal of economic entomology.

[13]  A. Shelton,et al.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Decio Ripandelli,et al.  An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops , 2008, Euphytica.

[15]  A. Crespo,et al.  Comparison and Validation of Methods To Quantify Cry1Ab Toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis for Standardization of Insect Bioassays , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  E. Pereira,et al.  Ten years of Bt resistance monitoring in the European corn borer: what we know, what we don't know, and what we can do better. , 2007 .

[17]  D. O'reilly,et al.  Insect resistance management for Syngenta's VipCot transgenic cotton. , 2007, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[18]  R. Akhurst,et al.  Variation in susceptibility of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia to two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. , 2007, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[19]  F. S. Walters,et al.  The Mode of Action of the Bacillus thuringiensis Vegetative Insecticidal Protein Vip3A Differs from That of Cry1Ab δ-Endotoxin , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Variation in Susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins among Unselected Strains ofPlutella xylostella , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  B. Siegfried,et al.  Development of Diagnostic Concentrations for Monitoring Bacillus thuringiensis Resistance in European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) , 2000, Journal of economic entomology.

[22]  R. Higgins,et al.  Susceptibility of Different Instars of European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Diet Containing Bacillus thuringiensis , 1999 .

[23]  L. Young,et al.  Baseline Susceptibility of European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins , 1999 .

[24]  L. Wan,et al.  Variation in Susceptibility of Noctuid (Lepidoptera) Larvae Attacking Cotton and Soybean to Purified Endotoxin Proteins and Commercial Formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis , 1999 .

[25]  H. Preisler,et al.  Natural Variation: A Complicating Factor in Bioassays with Chemical and Microbial Pesticides , 1995 .

[26]  S. Sims,et al.  Geographic Susceptibility of Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis , 1993 .

[27]  W. G. Yendol,et al.  Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): Genetic and Environmental Causes , 1990 .

[28]  T. R. Ashley,et al.  Quality Control in Insect Mass Production: A Review and Model , 1989 .

[29]  D. Perkins Fall Armyworm Symposium: Laboratory Rearing of the Fall Armyworm , 1979 .

[30]  L. Greenspan Humidity Fixed Points of Binary Saturated Aqueous Solutions , 1977, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry.

[31]  A. Gould,et al.  Probit Analysis, 3rd edition , 1973 .

[32]  L. Goldman,et al.  FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL Subpanel on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Plant-Pesticides and Resistance Management , 1998 .

[33]  D. Chambers QUALITY CONTROL IN MASS REARING , 1977 .