Time-domain analysis of EEG during Guilty Knowledge Test: Investigation of epoch extraction criteria

The study of electroencephalography (EEG) for deception detection has long been regarded as an alternative to the standard polygraphy, whose main shortcoming is its unacceptably low level of reliability. Most of the EEG deception research has focused on the amplitude and topography of P300. However, the characteristics of the P300 component are tightly connected to the experimental design and hence counter/measures are easily available for P300-based deception detection. The goal of this study is to evaluate different epoching criteria for the extraction of EEG features that are most suitable for the discrimination between truthful and deceptive responses. In order to reach this aim, a modified version of the Guilty Knowledge Test was used where EEG recordings were obtained from four frontal electrodes and two midline electrodes. In none of the electrodes the P300 component differed between deceptive and truthful responses. Differences have instead been revealed through the extraction of response-locked epochs and analysis of area under the curve.

[1]  Meltem Izzetoglu,et al.  Detecting deception in the brain: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of neural correlates of intentional deception , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[2]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Alper Bozkurt,et al.  NIR spectroscopy measurements of cognitive load elicited by GKT and target categorization , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[5]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  J. Polich,et al.  On P300 measurement stability: habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Feroze B. Mohamed,et al.  Brain Mapping of Deception and Truth telling about an ecologically valid situation : An fMRI and polygraph investigation , 2006 .

[8]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis: complex vs. simple paradigms. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  R. C. Gur,et al.  Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  B. Onaral,et al.  Wavelet analysis for EEG feature extraction in deception detection , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  V. Maclaren,et al.  A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 correlates of simulated malingered amnesia in a matching-to-sample task: topographic analyses of deception versus truthtelling responses. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  David T. Lykken,et al.  Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test , 1991, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[14]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  P300 and slow wave from oddball and single-stimulus visual tasks: inter-stimulus interval effects. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  T. Farrow,et al.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials. , 1995, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  R. Gur,et al.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 latency, but not amplitude or topography, distinguishes between true and false recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  E Donchin,et al.  The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Timothy J Ziemlewicz,et al.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[23]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  P300 scalp amplitude distribution as an index of deception in a simulated cognitive deficit model. , 1999, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.