Toward "Third Wave" Information Systems Research: Linking Sociomaterial Practice with Broader Institutional Logics

The sociomaterial movement has done much to strengthen the theorizing of IT artifacts in practice. This “second wave” information systems research, which focuses on theorizing of the interpenetration of IT artifacts and human activity, is a response to the positivistic, reductive accounts that overly simplified human activity around the development and adoption of IT in the name of generalizability. However, with their focus on local ideographic interpretation, sociomaterial views have abandoned the search for regularities across contexts and across time. In this paper, we take a step toward a “third wave” approach as we look to theoretically account for both idiosyncrasies in sociomaterial practice in situ, and the regularities across these practices. Drawing on institutional logics and the concept of sociomaterial practice, we develop a conceptualization that highlights how technologies afford the enactment of different practice scripts as users draw on different institutional logics.

[1]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[4]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[6]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[7]  B. Bruno The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociol... , 2004 .

[8]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[9]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[10]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[11]  Robin Williams,et al.  Software and Organisations: The Biography of the Enterprise-Wide System or How SAP Conquered the World , 2008 .

[12]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[13]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[14]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[16]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Response to Jones and Karsten, Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research , 2009 .

[17]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[18]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[19]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[20]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[21]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[22]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[23]  Candace Jones,et al.  Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005 , 2010 .

[24]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[26]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality , 2011 .

[27]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[28]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Postimplementation of NASA's Enterprise Information System , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  A. Pickering The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[30]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[31]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective , 2013 .

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[34]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Tarde's idea of quantification , 2010 .

[35]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: From Organization Design to Organization Designing , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[36]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[37]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Sociomateriality - More than Jargon monoxide? Questions from the Jester to the Sovereigns , 2012, ECIS.

[38]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[39]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..