Capturing Reading Processes in Connected Texts with Eye Movements and a Letter Detection Task

Are printed words identified the same way when presented in isolation and in connected texts? In order to answer this central question in the psychology of reading, different techniques have been developed. Prominent among these techniques, eye movements have considerably contributed to our knowledge. Although a lot has been learned with eye movements, important complementary knowledge has also been gained with a simple letter detection task. More specifically, when readers are asked to cross off all occurrences of a designated target letter, they are more likely to miss it in frequent than in less frequent words, in function than in content words, in correctly spelled than in incorrectly spelled words, etc. Recently, the letter detection task has been combined with eye movements to produce a rich dataset going beyond the contribution of each technique when used in isolation. In this chapter, we review the literature on the cognitive processes involved in reading connected texts highlighted by the combined use of eye movements and the letter search task.

[1]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the unitization reading model. , 1991 .

[3]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A. Healy,et al.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  17 – What Your Eyes Do while Your Mind Is Reading1 , 1983 .

[7]  A. Koriat,et al.  Age changes in the missing-letter effect reflect the reader's growing ability to extract the structure from text. , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context , 2002 .

[9]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. , 1995 .

[12]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  Age changes in the missing-letter effect revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  D. Corcoran,et al.  An Acoustic Factor in Letter Cancellation , 1966, Nature.

[14]  A. Koriat,et al.  The missing-letter effect in hebrew-word-frequency or word function , 1991 .

[15]  L A Lefton,et al.  Eye movements while reading and searching spatially transformed text: A developmental examination , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Klein,et al.  One missing-letter effect: two methods of assessment. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[18]  R. Klein,et al.  Eye movements when reading: The importance of the word to the left of fixation , 2012 .

[19]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Psychology of reading, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[20]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. , 1991 .

[21]  Philip T. Smith,et al.  Models for Letter Cancellation Performance and Their Implications for Models of Reading , 1982 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  R. Klein,et al.  Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  A. Healy,et al.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Attention demands during reading and the occurrence of brief (express) fixations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Don Read Detection of Fs in a single statement: The role of phonetic recoding , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[28]  R. Klein,et al.  Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J. Saint-Aubin,et al.  The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[30]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Acquisition of linguistic information to the left of fixation during the reading of Chinese text , 2009 .

[31]  G. Kambe,et al.  Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  A. Healy,et al.  Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size. , 1987 .

[33]  Short Article: The Impact of Letter Detection on Eye Movement Patterns during Reading: Reconsidering Lexical Analysis in Connected Text as a Function of Task , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Aaron J. Newman,et al.  Can skilled readers perform a second task in parallel? A functional connectivity MRI study , 2013, Brain and Language.

[35]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Letter-Detection Errors in the Word The: Word Frequency Versus Syntactic Structure , 2000 .

[36]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .

[37]  Vincent Gautier,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(00)00089-4 , 2000 .

[38]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[39]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[41]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Kevin O’Regan,et al.  Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Saint-Aubin,et al.  The role of eye movements in the missing-letter effect revisited with the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. , 2010, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.