Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Pitch, the perceptual correlate of fundamental frequency (F0), plays an important role in speech, music, and animal vocalizations. Changes in F0 over time help define musical melodies and speech prosody, while comparisons of simultaneous F0 are important for musical harmony, and for segregating competing sound sources. This study compared listeners' ability to detect differences in F0 between pairs of sequential or simultaneous tones that were filtered into separate, nonoverlapping spectral regions. The timbre differences induced by filtering led to poor F0 discrimination in the sequential, but not the simultaneous, conditions. Temporal overlap of the two tones was not sufficient to produce good performance; instead performance appeared to depend on the two tones being integrated into the same perceptual object. The results confirm the difficulty of comparing the pitches of sequential sounds with different timbres and suggest that, for simultaneous sounds, pitch differences may be detected through a decrease in perceptual fusion rather than an explicit coding and comparison of the underlying F0s.

[1]  D. Massaro Backward recognition masking. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Sequential F0 comparisons between resolved and unresolved harmonics: no evidence for translation noise between two pitch mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Internal noise and memory for pitch , 2005 .

[6]  Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al.  Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .

[7]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal integration and multiple looks. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  T. Dau,et al.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. Demany,et al.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception. , 2008, Psychological review.

[11]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  C J Darwin,et al.  Grouping in pitch perception: evidence for sequential constraints. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. Demany,et al.  Harmonic and melodic octave templates. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A. Oxenham,et al.  The psychophysics of pitch , 2005 .

[15]  L. Demany,et al.  Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  A central spectrum model: a synthesis of auditory-nerve timing and place cues in monaural communication of frequency spectrum. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Detection of inharmonicity in dichotic pure-tone dyads , 1992, Hearing Research.

[18]  R. Kinchla,et al.  A diffusion model of perceptual memory , 1967 .

[19]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Music Perception, Pitch, and the Auditory System This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Sensory Systems Edited Pitch Relations across Time—relative Pitch Relative Pitch—behavioral Evidence Neural Mechanisms of Relative Pitch Representation of Simultaneous Pitches— Chords and Polyphony Summary and , 2022 .

[20]  S Shamma,et al.  The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R Meddis,et al.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  W M Hartmann,et al.  On the origin of the enlarged melodic octave. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C D Creelman,et al.  Auditory phase and frequency discrimination: a comparison of nine procedures. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones , 1985 .

[25]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Right temporal cortex is critical for utilization of melodic contextual cues in a pitch constancy task. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms? , 1994 .

[27]  B C Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Comparing F0 discrimination in sequential and simultaneous conditions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Carlyon Comments on "A unitary model of pitch perception" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820 (1997)]. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .

[31]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .

[32]  Peter A. Cariani,et al.  Neural timing nets , 2001, Neural Networks.

[33]  E. Terhardt Pitch, consonance, and harmony. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. Fay,et al.  Auditory perception of sound sources , 2007 .

[35]  L. F. Willems,et al.  Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. L. Goldstein An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  C. Micheyl,et al.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[39]  T. W. Parsons Separation of speech from interfering speech by means of harmonic selection , 1976 .

[40]  A. de Cheveigné Multiple F0 estimation , 2006 .

[41]  M. Hautus Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′ , 1995 .

[42]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Musical octaves and pitch. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  The effect of cross-channel synchrony on the perception of temporal regularity. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  T Dau,et al.  Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  R. Fay,et al.  Pitch : neural coding and perception , 2005 .

[46]  D Laming,et al.  Retention in perceptual memory: A review of models and data , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  B. Delgutte,et al.  A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  D. Massaro,et al.  Backward Recognition Masking in Relative Pitch Judgments , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[49]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: Psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings , 2010, Hearing Research.

[50]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds: Fundamental frequency estimation and a time-domain cancell , 1993 .

[51]  K. Ohgushi,et al.  The origin of tonality and a possible explanation of the octave enlargement phenomenon. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[54]  Susan E. Rogers,et al.  Absolute pitch: perception, coding, and controversies , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  J H Grose,et al.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient? , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Guy J. Brown,et al.  Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 2006 .

[57]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and correct response probabilities in a signal detection theoretic, equal-variance Gaussian model of the observer in the 4IAX paradigm , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Auditory signal processing : physiology, psychoacoustics, and models , 2005 .

[59]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  Effects of Harmonicity and Regularity on the Perception of Sound Sources , 2008 .

[60]  Detection of across-frequency differences in fundamental frequency , 1992 .

[61]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of pitch pulse asynchrony. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  M. Patrick Feeney,et al.  Dichotic beats of mistuned consonances. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  W. D. Ward Subjective Musical Pitch , 1954 .

[64]  F. Wightman The pattern-transformation model of pitch. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  David Huron Voice Denumerability in Polyphonic Music of Homogeneous Timbres , 1989 .

[66]  J. Licklider,et al.  A duplex theory of pitch perception , 1951, Experientia.

[67]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Further examination of pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch in a computational physiological model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[70]  R. B. Gardner,et al.  Vowel quality changes produced by surrounding tone sequences , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.