The Effects of Computer-Assisted and Traditional Mastery Methods on Computation Accuracy and Attitudes

AbstractIn this study, the effects of instructional strategies designed to promote computation mastery were studied. These strategies included: traditional teacher-based mastery instruction with traditional teacher-based remedial tutoring, traditional mastery instruction with computerized remedial tutoring, computerized mastery instruction with computerized remedial tutoring; computerized mastery instruction with traditional remedial tutoring, and conventional nonmastery instruction. Analyses were conducted to examine the effects of mastery methods versus the conventional nonmastery methods and to study the effects of varied levels of traditional and computer-based mastery instruction. Mastery treatments were more effective than the nonmastery treatment for lesson achievement. Students performed best when the delivery system, traditional or computerized, was varied from initial instruction to remediation. No attitude differences were found between mastery and conventional instruction, but students receivi...

[1]  Marshall Arlin,et al.  Time, Equality, and Mastery Learning , 1984 .

[2]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools. , 1985 .

[3]  S. A. Cohen,et al.  Learning for Mastery: Ten Conclusions after 15 Years and 3,000 Schools. , 1979 .

[4]  Martha L. Atkinson Computer-Assisted Instruction: Current State of the Art , 1984 .

[5]  J. Kulik Synthesis of Research on Computer-Based Instruction. , 1983 .

[6]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Personalizing context in teaching mathematical concepts: Teacher-managed and computer-assisted models , 1985 .

[7]  L. Resnick Assuming That Everyone Can Learn Everything, Will Some Learn Less? , 1977, The School Review.

[8]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Rethinking Mastery Learning Reconsidered , 1987 .

[9]  J. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students. , 1983 .

[10]  M. Hannafin Fruits and Fallacies of Instructional Systems: Effects of an Instructional Systems Approach on the Concept Attainment of Anglo and Hispanic Students , 1983 .

[11]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik Effects of Testing for Mastery on Student Learning. , 1986 .

[12]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  Values, Evidence, and Mastery Learning , 1987 .

[13]  James H. Block Mastery Learning: The Current State of the Craft. , 1979 .

[14]  Frank J. Clement,et al.  Affective Considerations in Computer-Based Education. , 1981 .

[15]  H. Walberg Improving the Productivity of America's Schools. , 1984 .

[16]  R. Slavin Mastery Learning Reconsidered , 1987 .

[17]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[18]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Synthesis of Research on the Effects of Mastery Learning in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms , 1986 .

[19]  William F. Cox,et al.  Mastery learning: A psychological trap? , 1979 .

[20]  K. Torshen The mastery approach to competency-based education , 1977 .

[21]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Taking the Mystery Out of Mastery: A Response to Guskey, Anderson, and Burns , 1987 .

[22]  Immediate, Sustained, and Cumulative Effects of an Instructional System on Mathematics Achievement , 1983 .

[23]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDATION: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION TO THREE MEASURES OF COGNITIVE STRUCTURE , 1975 .

[24]  R. Clark Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta-analyses , 1985 .

[25]  Henry M. Levin,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of four educational interventions , 1984 .

[26]  M. Arlin,et al.  Time costs of mastery learning. , 1983 .

[27]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  The Importance of Treatment Explication: A Reply to J. Kulik, C-L. Kulik and R. Bangert-Drowns , 1985 .

[28]  G. Kearsley,et al.  Two Decades of Computer Based Instruction Projects: What Have We Learned?. , 1983 .

[29]  James H. Block,et al.  1: Mastery Learning , 1976 .

[30]  Mastery Learning: Partly Boon, Partly Boondoggle , 1976, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.