An integrated in silico screening strategy for identifying promising disruptors of p53-MDM2 interaction

The p53 protein, also called guardian of the genome, plays a critical role in the cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. This protein is frequently inactivated in several types of human cancer by abnormally high levels of its negative regulator, mouse double minute 2 (MDM2). As a result, restoration of p53 function by inhibiting p53-MDM2 protein-protein interaction has been pursued as a compelling strategy for cancer therapy. To date, a limited number of small-molecules have been reported as effective p53-MDM2 inhibitors. X-ray structures of MDM2 in complex with some ligands are available in Protein Data Bank and herein, these data have been exploited to efficiently identify new p53-MDM2 interaction antagonists through a hierarchical virtual screening strategy. For this purpose, the first step was aimed at compiling a focused library of 686,630 structurally suitable compounds, from PubChem database, similar to two known effective inhibitors, Nutlin-3a and DP222669. These compounds were subjected to the subsequent structure-based approaches (quantum polarized ligand docking and molecular dynamics simulation) to select potential compounds with highest binding affinity for MDM2 protein. Additionally, ligand binding energy, ADMET properties and PAINS analysis were also considered as filtering criteria for selecting the most promising drug-like molecules. On the basis of these analyses, three top-ranked hit molecules, CID_118439641, CID_60452010 and CID_3106907, were found to have acceptable pharmacokinetics properties along with superior in silico inhibitory ability towards the p53-MDM2 interaction compared to known inhibitors. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics results well confirmed the interactions of the final selected compounds with critical residues within p53 binding site on the MDM2 hydrophobic clefts with satisfactory thermodynamics stability. Consequently, the new final scaffolds identified by the presented computational approach could offer a set of guidelines for designing promising anti-cancer agents targeting p53-MDM2 interaction.

[1]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  The FAF-Drugs2 server: a multistep engine to prepare electronic chemical compound collections , 2011, Bioinform..

[2]  P. Kollman,et al.  Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  J. Canon,et al.  Structure-based design of novel inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Simone Brogi,et al.  Targeting clinically-relevant metallo-β-lactamases: from high-throughput docking to broad-spectrum inhibitors , 2016, Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  FAF-Drugs2: Free ADME/tox filtering tool to assist drug discovery and chemical biology projects , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Niu Huang,et al.  Physics-Based Scoring of Protein-Ligand Complexes: Enrichment of Known Inhibitors in Large-Scale Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  A. Levine,et al.  The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. , 1993, Genes & development.

[8]  C. García-echeverría,et al.  Inhibitors of the p53/hdm2 protein-protein interaction-path to the clinic. , 2013, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[9]  M. Pinto,et al.  Enhanced cytotoxicity of prenylated chalcone against tumour cells via disruption of the p53-MDM2 interaction. , 2015, Life sciences.

[10]  Guoqiang Dong,et al.  Discovery, synthesis, and biological evaluation of orally active pyrrolidone derivatives as novel inhibitors of p53-MDM2 protein-protein interaction. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  M. Noble,et al.  MDM2-p53 protein-protein interaction inhibitors: a-ring substituted isoindolinones. , 2011, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[12]  Paul D Lyne,et al.  Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  M. Tutone,et al.  Molecular modeling approaches in the discovery of new drugs for anti-cancer therapy: the investigation of p53-MDM2 interaction and its inhibition by small molecules. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[15]  Wenwei Hu,et al.  Tumor suppressor p53: new functions of an old protein , 2011, Frontiers in Biology.

[16]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[17]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 protein-protein interaction to reactivate p53 function: a novel approach for cancer therapy. , 2009, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[18]  M. Coletta,et al.  Development of Potent Inhibitors of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Virulence Factor Zmp1 and Evaluation of Their Effect on Mycobacterial Survival inside Macrophages , 2018, ChemMedChem.

[19]  S. Lowe,et al.  Control of apoptosis by p53 , 2003, Oncogene.

[20]  Abeer A. Alhadi,et al.  PASS-assisted design, synthesis and antioxidant evaluation of new butylated hydroxytoluene derivatives. , 2014, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[22]  Victor Guallar,et al.  Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Structure based virtual screening, docking and molecular dynamic simulation studies to identify potent mdm2-p53 inhibitors: Future implications for cancer therapy , 2017 .

[24]  Anna Maria Almerico,et al.  Molecular dynamics studies on Mdm2 complexes: an analysis of the inhibitor influence. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  A. Levine,et al.  Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain , 1996, Science.

[26]  Xueliang Fang,et al.  Discovery of a nanomolar inhibitor of the human murine double minute 2 (MDM2)-p53 interaction through an integrated, virtual database screening strategy. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  L. Vassilev,et al.  In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2 , 2004, Science.

[28]  F. Chibon,et al.  Heterogeneous Mechanisms of Secondary Resistance and Clonal Selection in Sarcoma during Treatment with Nutlin , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[30]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[31]  Jonathan C. Fuller,et al.  Predicting druggable binding sites at the protein-protein interface. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[32]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Discovery of RG7388, a potent and selective p53-MDM2 inhibitor in clinical development. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview. , 2004, Current pharmaceutical design.

[34]  M. Hollstein,et al.  p53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations. , 2000, Advances in cancer research.

[35]  A. Stegh Targeting the p53 signaling pathway in cancer therapy – the promises, challenges and perils , 2012, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[36]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  Prediction of the Biological Activity Spectra of Organic Compounds Using the Pass Online Web Resource , 2014, Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds.

[37]  L. Vassilev p53 Activation by small molecules: application in oncology. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Gabriele Cruciani,et al.  Targeting the Conformational Transitions of MDM2 and MDMX: Insights into Dissimilarities and Similarities of p53 Recognition , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[39]  Simone Brogi,et al.  Identification of novel fluorescent probes preventing PrPSc replication in prion diseases. , 2017, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[41]  W. Im,et al.  Novel pyrrolopyrimidine-based α-helix mimetics: cell-permeable inhibitors of protein−protein interactions. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[43]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[44]  V. Poroikov,et al.  PASS-assisted exploration of new therapeutic potential of natural products , 2011, Medicinal Chemistry Research.

[45]  Jeremy R. Greenwood,et al.  Epik: a software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[46]  Simone Brogi,et al.  Computational Tool for Fast in silico Evaluation of hERG K+ Channel Affinity , 2017, Front. Chem..

[47]  Josep Ramón Goñi,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations: advances and applications , 2015, Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC.

[48]  Simone Brogi,et al.  Pharmacophore Modeling for Qualitative Prediction of Antiestrogenic Activity , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[49]  Hannah M Jones,et al.  Predicting pharmacokinetic profiles using in silico derived parameters. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[50]  Maxwell D Cummings,et al.  Discovery and cocrystal structure of benzodiazepinedione HDM2 antagonists that activate p53 in cells. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  J. Miners,et al.  Towards integrated ADME prediction: past, present and future directions for modelling metabolism by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[52]  Zeger Debyser,et al.  Synthesis, Molecular Modelling and Biological Studies of 3-hydroxy-pyrane-4-one and 3-hydroxy-pyridine-4-one Derivatives as HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors. , 2019, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).

[53]  D. Bernard,et al.  Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the MDM2–p53 Protein–Protein Interaction (MDM2 Inhibitors) in Clinical Trials for Cancer Treatment , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  A. Palmeira,et al.  Medicinal Chemistry Strategies to Disrupt the p53–MDM2/MDMX Interaction , 2016, Medicinal research reviews.

[55]  Markus J. Bauer,et al.  Discovery of Novel Spiro[3H-indole-3,2'-pyrrolidin]-2(1H)-one Compounds as Chemically Stable and Orally Active Inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 Interaction. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[56]  B. Berne,et al.  A Multiple-Time-Step Molecular Dynamics Algorithm for Macromolecules , 1994 .

[57]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[58]  P. Charifson,et al.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[59]  Federico D. Sacerdoti,et al.  Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[60]  J. Deschamps,et al.  Structure-based design of potent non-peptide MDM2 inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[61]  Gang Fu,et al.  PubChem Substance and Compound databases , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[62]  Sharmila Patel,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of the p53-HDM2 interaction for the treatment of cancer , 2008, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[63]  A. Levine,et al.  Functions of the MDM2 oncoprotein , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[64]  S. Parasuraman Prediction of activity spectra for substances , 2011, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[65]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[66]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[67]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[68]  Simone Brogi,et al.  Structure-based discovery of the first non-covalent inhibitors of Leishmania major tryparedoxin peroxidase by high throughput docking , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[69]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[70]  A. Palmeira,et al.  Discovery of a new small-molecule inhibitor of p53-MDM2 interaction using a yeast-based approach. , 2013, Biochemical pharmacology.

[71]  Simone Brogi,et al.  3D-QSAR using pharmacophore-based alignment and virtual screening for discovery of novel MCF-7 cell line inhibitors. , 2013, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[72]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[73]  Garrett M Morris,et al.  Assessing the role of polarization in docking. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[74]  P. Chène Inhibiting the p53–MDM2 interaction: an important target for cancer therapy , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.