Use of Personal Emergency Response Systems by Older Individuals With Disabilities

This article describes how older persons perceive and use personal emergency response systems (PERSs), including issues related to device design, and report reasons for nonuse of PERSs. Data for this study were collected through a semistructured questionnaire that included fixed and open-ended response questions. Six hundred six participants 60 years and older were surveyed. Descriptive statistics were used to report sample characteristics. The most often-stated reason for using a PERS was related to concerns with falling (40% of responses). Asked how a PERS has been helpful, 75.6% of participants expressed an enhanced feeling of security with their PERS. Lack of perceived need (57.0% of responses), cost (37.0%), and lack of knowledge of the device (23.7%) were the most frequently stated reasons for not using a PERS. This study found that, while PERSs provide benefits for many elders, there appear to be many older persons who could benefit who do not have one. Only 16% of participants in this study, all of whom had disabilities, used a PERS.

[1]  J G Rodriguez,et al.  The incidence of fall injury events among the elderly in a defined population. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  R. Roush,et al.  Impact of a Personal Emergency Response System on Hospital Utilization by Community- Residing Elders , 1995, Southern medical journal.

[3]  Personal emergency response systems: factors associated with use among older persons. , 1995, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[4]  T. M. Kashner,et al.  The Economic Cost of Hip Fractures in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Prospective Study , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  William C. Mann Common Telecommunications Technology for Promoting Safety, Independence, and Social Interaction for Older People with Disabilities , 1997 .

[6]  B. Resnick Falls in a Community of Older Adults , 1999, Clinical nursing research.

[7]  C. Granger,et al.  Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Archives of family medicine.

[8]  "Low-tech" personal emergency response systems reduce costs and improve outcomes. , 2000, Managed care quarterly.

[9]  A fall lands close to home. , 2001, Geriatrics.

[10]  A fall lands close to home. , 2001 .

[11]  Why I chose to be 'Dr. Beyond'. , 2001 .

[12]  M. J. Hall,et al.  2000 National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 2002, Advance data.

[13]  N. Col,et al.  Estimating Hip Fracture Morbidity, Mortality and Costs , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.