Good Policy Can Lower Violent Crime: Evidence from a Cross-National Panel of Homicide Rates, 1980–97

This article provides empirical evidence that good political governance and good economic policies can lower homicide rates. Therefore, violent crime is not simply determined by modernization, population characteristics, and cultural factors. This result follows from rigorous econometric testing based on a cross-national panel of homicide data from up to 117 countries over the period 1980–97. Contrary to most existing studies, which have applied ordinary least squares on data drawn from one time period only, this analysis uses a fixed-effects estimator with fully robust standard errors. A fixed-effects estimator elegantly controls for time-invariant determinants, such as cultural factors, and allows the pooling of homicide data from otherwise incompatible sources. This is complemented by randomeffects estimation in sensitivity analysis. The results suggest that economic growth, higher income levels, respect for human rights, and the abolition of the death penalty are all associated with lower homicide rates. The same is true for democracy at high levels of democracy. The transition from autocracy to democracy is likely to be accompanied by a rising homicide rate, however, until full democracy has been reached. Results also indicate that policies aimed at improving equity have no effect on violent crime. In particular, there is evidence that the positive effect of income inequality on homicide rates found in many studies might be spurious. The results reported here are strikingly similar to those found for the causes of civil war.

[1]  J. Weicher The Effect of Income on Delinquency: Comment , 1970 .

[2]  B. Fleisher The Effect of Income on Delinquency: Reply , 1970 .

[3]  David Lester,et al.  Crime as Opportunity: A Test of the Hypothesis with European Homicide Rates , 1991 .

[4]  Rodrigo R. Soares Development, crime and punishment: accounting for the international differences in crime rates , 2004 .

[5]  W. S. W. Huang A Cross-National Analysis on the Effect of Moral Individualism on Murder Rates , 1995 .

[6]  W. Neuman,et al.  Competing Perspectives on Cross-National Crime: An Evaluation of Theory and Evidence , 1988 .

[7]  Fred C. Pampel,et al.  Age Structure, Socio-Political Institutions, and National Homicide Rates , 1995 .

[8]  Morgan Kelly Inequality and Crime , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  L. Shelley,et al.  Civilization, Modernization and the Development of Crime and Control , 1992 .

[10]  Christopher Cornwell,et al.  Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Panel Data , 1994 .

[11]  M. Cooney From warre to tyranny : Lethal conflict and the state , 1997 .

[12]  G. Esping‐Andersen,et al.  The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1990 .

[13]  S. Messner Societal Development, Social Equality, and Homicide: A Cross-National Test of a Durkheimian Model , 1982 .

[14]  Pablo Fajnzylber,et al.  Inequality and Violent Crime* , 2002, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[15]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[16]  R. Gartner The Victims of Homicide: A Temporal and Cross-National Comparison , 1990 .

[17]  I. Rossow Alcohol and homicide: a cross-cultural comparison of the relationship in 14 European countries. , 2001, Addiction.

[18]  Christina D. Romer The Cyclical Behavior of Individual Production Series, 1889–1984 , 1991 .

[19]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Political Restraint of the Market and Levels of Criminal Homicide: A Cross-National Application of Institutional-Anomie Theory , 1997 .

[20]  Klaus Deininger,et al.  A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality , 1996 .

[21]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: further evidence on the cost of inequality. , 1989 .

[22]  S. Blomberg,et al.  The Temporal Links between Conflict and Economic Activity , 2002 .

[23]  Tanja Ellingsen,et al.  Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992 , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[24]  G. LaFree,et al.  Crime and control in comparative perspectives , 1992 .

[25]  R. Parker,et al.  Cross-National Evidence on Homicide and the Age Structure of the Population , 1990 .

[26]  R. Gartner Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Large-Survey Research on Violence , 1993, Violence and Victims.

[27]  I. Ehrlich Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  R. Summers,et al.  The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1987 , 1991 .

[29]  POPULATION DIVERSITY AND CROSS‐NATIONAL HOMICIDE: THE EFFECTS OF INEQUALITY AND HETEROGENEITY* , 1986 .

[30]  J. Neapolitan Homicides in Developing Nations: Results of Research Using a Large and Representative Sample , 1997 .

[31]  P. Collier,et al.  Greed and Grievance in Civil War , 1999 .

[32]  Richard R. Bennett DEVELOPMENT AND CRIME: A Cross‐National, Time‐Series Analysis of Competing Models , 1991 .

[33]  John,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INCOME INEQUALITY AND SOCIAL DEMOCRACY ON HOMICIDE A Cross-National Comparision , 1980 .

[34]  Craig V. D. Thornton,et al.  Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice , 1986 .

[35]  U. Zvekić,et al.  Understanding crime experiences of crime and crime control , 1993 .

[36]  Richard R. Bennett Routine Activities: A Cross-National Assessment of a Criminological Perspective , 1991 .

[37]  C. Wellford,et al.  Assessing Indicators Of Crime Among International Crime Data Series , 1989 .

[38]  Margaret A. Zahn,et al.  Homicide : a sourcebook of social research , 1999 .

[39]  Daniel Lederman,et al.  What causes violent crime , 2002 .

[40]  J. Neapolitan,et al.  Cross-National Crime: A Research Review and Sourcebook , 1997 .

[41]  John Hagan,et al.  Crime and Inequality , 1996 .

[42]  Dane Archer,et al.  HOMICIDE AND THE DEATH PENALTY : A CROSS-NATIONAL TEST OF A DETERRENCE HYPOTHESIS * , 2017 .

[43]  J. Neapolitan Cross-National Variation in Homicides: The Case of Latin America , 1994 .

[44]  J. Gartrell,et al.  INCOME INEQUALITY AND HOMICIDE RATES: CROSS‐NATIONAL DATA AND CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES , 1986 .

[45]  D. Lester The association between alcohol consumption and suicide and homicide rates: a study of 13 nations. , 1995, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[46]  Jukka Savolainen,et al.  INEQUALITY, WELFARE STATE, AND HOMICIDE: FURTHER SUPPORT FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL ANOMIE THEORY* , 2000 .

[47]  François Bourguignon,et al.  Crime as a social cost of poverty and inequality: a review focusing on developing countries , 1999 .

[48]  D. Skidmore Security: A New Framework for Analysis . By Buzan Barry, Weaver Ole, and de Wilde Jaap. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998. 239p. $55.00 cloth, $19.95 paper. , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Norbert Elias,et al.  The Civilizing Process , 1939 .