Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth

[1]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[2]  J. Cutting,et al.  Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  G. Sperling,et al.  Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure , 1986, Vision Research.

[4]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[5]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[8]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  A Statistical Framework for Robust Fusion of Depth Information , 1989, Other Conferences.

[9]  B J Rogers,et al.  The Appearance of Surfaces Specified by Motion Parallax and Binocular Disparity , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  M. Landy,et al.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[11]  A. Parker,et al.  Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  A. Parker,et al.  Effects of different texture cues on curved surfaces viewed stereoscopically , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  R. Blake,et al.  On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Poggio,et al.  The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition , 1994, Current Biology.

[16]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[18]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perception of space and motion , 1995 .

[20]  M. Pauline Baker,et al.  Computer Graphics, C Version , 1996 .

[21]  J F Norman,et al.  The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  D. Sheinberg,et al.  Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics , 1996 .

[23]  Layout Perception during Simulated Locomotion , 1997 .

[24]  G J Andersen,et al.  Relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  F. Phillips,et al.  The Perception of Scale-Dependent and Scale-Independent Surface Structure from Binocular Disparity, Texture, and Shading , 1998, Perception.

[26]  J. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface curvature from optical motion , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  D. Knill.  Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture , 1998, Vision Research.