The Semantics of Lexical Underspecification

In this paper, I examine the mechanisms responsible for enabling underspecified lexical forms to acquire a determinate and unique interpretation in the composition of the sentence. In particular, I study the behavior of several classes of lexical items exhibiting degrees of systematic or logical polysemy. These words present an interesting challenge to conventional treatments of polysemy and full specification in natural language semantics. Extending the analysis of these classes presented in Pustejovsky (1994,1995), I elaborate the formal mechanisms responisible for capturing the syntactic and semantic behavior of nouns such as lecture, prize, book, and lunch, and verbs such as read, rent, and break. I argue that members of these classes must be represented as complex types, as they do not allow for simple conjunctive typing; furthermore, these nouns and verbs display a peculiar behavior regarding the quantificational force of the type which is absent from other nominal and verbal classes. I conclude by discussing the consequences of this analysis for a theory of semantic underspecification.

[1]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[2]  Jurij D. Apresjan,et al.  Synonymy and Synonyms , 1973 .

[3]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Multiple subcategorization and the ϑ-criterion: The case of climb , 1985 .

[4]  Sara Thomas Rosen,et al.  Argument structure and complex predicates , 1990 .

[5]  J. Moravcsik Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle's philosophy , 1975, Dialogue.

[6]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  Travels through semantic space , 1958 .

[7]  J. Peregrin LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY , 1998 .

[8]  G. Nunberg The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy , 1979 .

[9]  Ann Copestake,et al.  The Representation of Lexical Semantic Information , 1992 .

[10]  J. Pustejovsky Generativity and Explanation in Semantics: A Reply to Fodor and Lepore , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  A Preferential, Pattern-Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference , 1975, Artif. Intell..

[12]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Semantic Typing and Degrees of Polymorphism , 1994 .

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Light verbs and 'th'-marking , 1988 .

[14]  Federica Busa Compositionality and the semantics of nominals , 1997 .

[15]  David Maier,et al.  The Theory of Relational Databases , 1983 .

[16]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity , 1987, Studies in natural language processing.

[17]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[18]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  Webster's Third: A Critique of Its Semantics , 1964, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[19]  B. T. S. Atkins,et al.  Predictable Meaning Shift: Some Linguistic Properties of Lexical Implication Rules , 1991, SIGLEX Workshop.

[20]  R. Sorensen The metaphysics of words , 1996 .

[21]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Logical Structures in the Lexicon , 1991, Knowl. Based Syst..

[22]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Lexical Operations in a Unification-based Framework , 1991, SIGLEX Workshop.

[23]  J. Pustejovsky Computational lexical semantics: Linguistic constraints on type coercion , 1995 .

[24]  Daniel Kayser,et al.  What kind of thing is a concept? , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[25]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: Construction, Representation and Deduction , 1993, J. Semant..

[26]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Lexical Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Processing , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[27]  益子 真由美 Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[28]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Commonsense Entailment: A Modal Theory of Non-monotonic Reasoning , 1991, IJCAI.

[29]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On the Semantic Structure of Language , 1963 .

[30]  Antonio Sanfilippo,et al.  Grammatical relations, thematic roles and verb semantics , 1991 .

[31]  R. M. Hare,et al.  Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. , 1965 .

[32]  John F. Sowa Logical structures in the lexicon , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..