Use of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging as diagnostic technique to predict compatibility in melon graft

Abstract Grafts cause stress in plants that can be measured by changes in chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence. Variations in fluorescence parameters can be visualized through images that reveal spatial and temporal changes in grafted plants. To validate the sensitivity of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging (CFI) as a diagnostic method of studying compatibility/incompatibility in grafted plants, we used melon cultivars (‘Ricura’ and ‘Sancho’, Cucumis melo L. var. saccharinus Naud.) grafted onto Cucurbita maxima Duchesne ×  Cucurbita moschata Duchesne (‘Shintoza’). Previous results had shown different compatibility behaviour of the two cultivars, ‘Ricura’ (R) having in more relative frequency higher compatibility problems with ‘Shintoza’ (SH) rootstock than ‘Sancho’ (S). The use of double grafting using an intermediate melon cultivar between R and SH has proved effective in increasing compatibility. Among all the fluorescence parameters measured (Fv/Fm, ϕPSII and ϕNPQ), the Fv/Fm ratio, proportional to the maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry, was shown to be the most sensitive to graft stress. The values of the Fv/Fm ratio images were higher in S single-grafted plants than R single grafted, while Fv/Fm values were similar in both cultivars in double grafted plants. On the other hand, R double grafted had higher Fv/Fm values than R single grafts. The results showed that CFI is useful in evaluating graft compatibility problems.

[1]  Eva Rosenqvist,et al.  Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  L. Guidi,et al.  Effects of ozone exposure or fungal pathogen on white lupin leaves as determined by imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence. , 2007, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[3]  O. Björkman,et al.  Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins , 1987, Planta.

[4]  Ana Pina,et al.  A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility , 2005 .

[5]  David M. Kramer,et al.  New Fluorescence Parameters for the Determination of QA Redox State and Excitation Energy Fluxes , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[6]  Elisa Gorbe,et al.  Effect of two nutrient solution temperatures on nitrate uptake, nitrate reductase activity, NH4+ concentration and chlorophyll a fluorescence in rose plants , 2008 .

[7]  Richard S Quilliam,et al.  Imaging photosynthesis in wounded leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  K. Oxborough,et al.  Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence: theoretical and practical aspects of an emerging technique for the monitoring of photosynthetic performance. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[9]  Xingping Zhang,et al.  Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae , 2010 .

[10]  S. Rolfe,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of plant–pathogen interactions , 2010, Protoplasma.

[11]  R. Cohen,et al.  Physiological and biochemical changes at the rootstock-scion interface in graft combinations between Cucurbita rootstocks and a melon scion , 2008 .

[12]  D. Backhouse,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants , 2008 .

[13]  Á. Calatayud,et al.  Involvement of the thylakoidal NADH-plastoquinone-oxidoreductase complex in the early responses to ozone exposure of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedlings. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[14]  K Maxwell,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[16]  M. Carvajal,et al.  Physiological aspects of rootstock-scion interactions , 2010 .

[17]  Á. Calatayud,et al.  Effects of simple and double grafting melon plants on mineral absorption, photosynthesis, biomass and yield , 2011 .

[18]  N. Baker.  Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[19]  C. Osmond.  What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants , 1994 .

[20]  H. Lichtenthaler.  Vegetation stress : an introduction to the stress concept in plants , 1996 .

[21]  R. Cohen,et al.  Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of Cucurbita rootstocks on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melons , 2004 .

[22]  Á. Calatayud,et al.  Spatial-temporal variations in rose leaves under water stress conditions studied by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. , 2006, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.