The prevalence of, and factors related to, compliance with glove utilization among nurses in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Increasing risk of HIV infections among health care workers has been a continuing concern. The study was designed to identify the compliance of glove utilization, and factors related to non-compliance. A sample of 150 staff nurses were recruited from the study population of 550 nurses in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Data were collected by using a structured self-administered questionnaires. The response rate was 98.4%. The study revealed a low compliance (13.5%) of glove utilization (for all 9 procedures), which varied among different procedures (27-97%). Younger nurses and those with shorter duration of working experience had better knowledge of Universal Precautions. Nurses in intensive care unit and operation theatre were better in both knowledge and compliance of glove utilization. The three commonest misconceptions were identified as "selective use of gloves for high risk groups and suspected cases", and "tendency to depend on HIV prevalence". Nurses reported practical problems including administrative and personal related such as "stock irregularity" (46%), "glove not available at the emergency sites" (44%), and "reduction of tactile sensation" (39%). It was concluded that poor knowledge and practical problems were possible responsible factors for the low compliance. A good training for nurses comprising principle and practice of Universal Precautions, updated knowledge of blood and body fluid borne infections and risk and its management, will probably improve the compliance.

[1]  L. Gaitini,et al.  Compliance with gloving in anesthesia: an observational study of gloving practice at induction of general anesthesia. , 1997, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[2]  J. Mccrohan,et al.  Glove use by health care workers: results of a tristate investigation. , 1991, American journal of infection control.

[3]  F. Burke,et al.  Practitioner and student latex exposure and allergy. , 1996, Journal.

[4]  S. Nelsing,et al.  Noncompliance With Universal Precautions and the Associated Risk of Mucocutaneous Blood Exposure Among Danish Physicians , 1997, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  A. Adegboye,et al.  Glove Utilization and Reasons for Poor Compliance by Health Care Workers in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital , 1997, Tropical doctor.

[6]  N. Bodsworth,et al.  Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  Andrew G. Dean,et al.  Epi info, version 6 : a word-processing, database, and statistics program for public health on IBM-compatible microcomputers , 1996 .

[8]  S. Sherman,et al.  The Use and Failure Rates of Protective Equipment to Prevent Blood and Bodily Fluid Contamination in the Obstetric Health Care Worker , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  W. Picheansathian Compliance with universal precautions by emergency room nurses at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. , 1995, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[10]  P. Francioli,et al.  Exposure to blood during various procedures: results of two surveys before and after the implementation of universal precautions. , 1992, American journal of infection control.

[11]  S. Kippax,et al.  Infection control and HIV-related discrimination and anxiety. Glove use during venipuncture. , 1998, Australian family physician.

[12]  D. Celentano,et al.  Adherence to Universal (barrier) Precautions during interventions on critically ill and injured emergency department patients. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.