Abstract Single Point Incremental Sheet Forming (SPIF) is a versatile forming process that has gained significant traction over the past few decades. Its increased formability, quick part adaption, and reduced set-up costs make it an economical choice for small batch and rapid prototype forming applications when compared to traditional stamping processes. However, a common problem with the SPIF process is its tendency to produce high geometric error due to the lack of supporting dies and molds. While geometric error has been a primary focus of recent research, it is still significantly larger for SPIF than traditional forming processes. In this paper, the convergence behavior and the ability to reduce geometric error using a simple Iterative Learning Control (ILC) algorithm is studied with two different forming methods. For both methods a tool path for the desired reference geometry is generated and a part is formed. A Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system takes a measurement and the geometric error along the tool path is calculated. The ILC algorithm then uses the geometric error to alter the tool path for the next forming iteration. The first method, the Single Sheet Forming (SSF) method, performs each iteration on the same sheet. The second method, the Multi Sheet Forming (MSF) method, performs each iteration on a newly replaced sheet. Multiple experiments proved the capability of each method at reducing geometric error. It was concluded that using the MSF method allows for negative corrections to the forming part and, therefore, leads to better final part accuracy. However, this method is less cost effective and more time consuming than using the standard SSF methodology. In addition, it was found that in order to effectively correct a part with an ILC algorithm, steps must be taken to increase the controllability of the part geometry.
[1]
A. H. van den Boogaard,et al.
The technology of Incremental Sheet Forming¿A brief review of the history
,
2010
.
[2]
Paul A. Meehan,et al.
Model predictive control of incremental sheet forming for geometric accuracy improvement
,
2016
.
[3]
Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.
Improving Accuracy in Aluminum Incremental Sheet Forming of Complex Geometries Using Iterative Learning Control
,
2015
.
[4]
Julian M. Allwood,et al.
The mechanics of incremental sheet forming
,
2009
.
[5]
Fabrizio Micari,et al.
Shape and dimensional accuracy in Single Point Incremental Forming: State of the art and future trends
,
2007
.
[6]
Massimo Callegari,et al.
Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal by Means of Parallel Kinematics Machines
,
2008
.
[7]
Arman Khan,et al.
Tool Path Definition for Numerical Simulation of Single Point Incremental Forming
,
2013
.
[8]
Giuseppe Ingarao,et al.
Single point incremental forming: An assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015
,
2017
.
[9]
Jun Gu,et al.
Strain evolution in the single point incremental forming process: digital image correlation measurement and finite element prediction
,
2011
.
[10]
Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.
Development of Tool Path Correction Algorithm in Incremental Sheet Forming
,
2014
.
[11]
Suguru Arimoto,et al.
Bettering operation of Robots by learning
,
1984,
J. Field Robotics.