Performance evaluation of PUMA routing protocol for Manhattan mobility model on vehicular ad-hoc network

The Quality of Service (QoS) on the traffic environment with high mobility, dynamic topology, and change trajectory is one of the challenges in the use of Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANET) Routing Protocols. PUMA routing protocol presents multicast work mechanism based on shared mesh topology. It always dynamically adapt to VANET traffic conditions. In this paper, we evaluated the PUMA routing protocol performance using the Manhattan Mobility Model with the effect of the Nakagami fading distribution in VANET. We also analyse the average node distribution in the tagged vehicle communication range using Poisson distribution. We use the NS 2.34 and VanetMobiSim for the simulation and evaluation of the performance. The performance results will be analyzed by varying the traffic parameters in the Manhattan mobility model from low to high traffic condition. The simulation result shows that the communication range under the Nakagami fading distribution affected the Quality of Service (QoS) in VANET. We found that the delay is higher compared with those in the condition without Nakagami fading. The throughput is also lower compared with those in the condition without Nakagami fading.

[1]  Jorjeta G. Jetcheva,et al.  Adaptive demand-driven multicast routing in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[2]  Jorjeta G. Jetcheva,et al.  Adaptive demand-driven multicast routing in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[3]  Luciano Bononi,et al.  Modeling and simulation of WAVE 1609.4-based multi-channel vehicular ad hoc networks , 2012, SimuTools.

[4]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Performance enhancement of multirate IEEE 802.11 WLANs with geographically scattered stations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[5]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  MAC in Motion: Impact of Mobility on the MAC of Drive-Thru Internet , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[6]  Jon W. Mark,et al.  Performance Analysis and Enhancement of the DSRC for VANET's Safety Applications , 2013, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[7]  Riri Fitri Sari,et al.  Mobility models performance analysis using random Dijkstra algorithm and doppler effect for IEEE 1609.4 standard , 2013 .

[8]  D. Sidhu,et al.  MZR: a multicast protocol for mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[9]  M. Hadzialic,et al.  Estimation of nakagami distribution parameters based on signal samples corrupted with multiplicative and additive disturbances , 2007, ELMAR 2007.

[10]  Radia Perlman,et al.  An algorithm for distributed computation of a spanningtree in an extended LAN , 1985, SIGCOMM '85.

[11]  J.E. Mazo,et al.  Digital communications , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  C. Siva Ram Murthy,et al.  A dynamic core based multicast routing protocol for ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[13]  S Sumathy,et al.  Analysis of Multicast Routing Protocols: Puma and Odmrp , 2012 .

[14]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance Of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[15]  Jörg Hähner,et al.  Graph-based mobility model for mobile ad hoc network simulation , 2002, Proceedings 35th Annual Simulation Symposium. SS 2002.

[16]  Chong-kwon Kim,et al.  Neighbor supporting ad hoc multicast routing protocol , 2000, 2000 First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. MobiHOC (Cat. No.00EX444).

[17]  J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.  Efficient and robust multicast routing in mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04EX975).

[18]  Riri Fitri Sari,et al.  Multicast routing performance analysis for different mobility models on the IEEE 1609.4 standard using random Dijkstra algorithm , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG).