Influence of the vertical distribution of cyanobacteria in the water column on the remote sensing signal

An increased intensity of cyanobacterial blooms and their potentially harmful effects have attracted the attention of environmental agencies, water authorities and the general public worldwide. Reliable operational monitoring methods of coastal waters, lakes and ponds are needed. Mapping of the surface extent of cyanobacterial blooms with remote sensing is straightforward, but recognizing waters dominated by cyanobacteria throughout the water column and quantitative mapping of cyanobacterial biomass with remote sensing is more complicated. Unlike most algae, cyanobacteria can regulate their buoyancy and move vertically in the water column. We used the Hydrolight 4.2 radiative transfer model and the specific optical properties of three species of cyanobacteria to study the impact of vertical distribution of cyanobacteria on the remote sensing signal. The results show that the vertical distribution of cyanobacteria in the water column has a significant impact on the remote sensing signal. This result indicates that developing remote sensing methods for quantitative mapping of cyanobacterial biomass is much more complex than quantitative mapping of an algal biomass that is uniformly distributed in the top mixed layer of water column.

[1]  R. A. Neville,et al.  Passive remote sensing of phytoplankton via chlorophyll α fluorescence , 1977 .

[2]  J. Svejkovsky,et al.  Detection of offshore plankton blooms with AVHRR and SAR imagery , 2001 .

[3]  U. Larsson,et al.  Phytoplankton vertical distributions and composition in Baltic Sea cyanobacterial blooms , 2007 .

[4]  K. Sellner,et al.  Physiology, ecology, and toxic properties of marine cyanobacteria blooms , 1997 .

[5]  J. Gower,et al.  Interpretation of the 685nm peak in water-leaving radiance spectra in terms of fluorescence, absorption and scattering, and its observation by MERIS , 1999 .

[6]  I. Joint,et al.  Estimation of phytoplankton production from space: current status and future potential of satellite remote sensing. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[7]  R. Hauck,et al.  Misalignment sensitivity of optical resonators. , 1980, Applied optics.

[8]  D. Stramski,et al.  An evaluation of MODIS and SeaWiFS bio-optical algorithms in the Baltic Sea , 2004 .

[9]  J. Pulliainen,et al.  The combined use of optical remote sensing data and unattended flow‐through fluorometer measurements in the Baltic Sea , 2005 .

[10]  J. Pulliainen,et al.  Retrieval of water quality from airborne imaging spectrometry of various lake types in different seasons. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Modeling spectral discrimination of Great Barrier Reef benthic communities by remote sensing instruments , 2003 .

[12]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Quantitative remote sensing methods for real-time monitoring of inland waters quality , 1993 .

[13]  Jukka Seppälä,et al.  Ship-of-opportunity based phycocyanin fluorescence monitoring of the filamentous cyanobacteria bloom dynamics in the Baltic Sea , 2007 .

[14]  Vittorio E. Brando,et al.  Satellite hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating estuarine and coastal water quality , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Recognising cyanobacterial blooms based on their optical signature : a modelling study , 2006 .

[16]  H. Paerl,et al.  Blue-green algal scums: An explanation for their occurrence during freshwater blooms1 , 1982 .

[17]  Mati Kahru,et al.  Cyanobacterial blooms cause heating of the sea surface , 1993 .

[18]  K. Baker,et al.  Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200-800 nm). , 1981, Applied optics.

[19]  Graham P. Harris,et al.  Detection, identification and mapping of cyanobacteria — Using remote sensing to measure the optical quality of turbid inland waters , 1994 .

[20]  Giorgio Dall'Olmo,et al.  Effect of bio-optical parameter variability and uncertainties in reflectance measurements on the remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters: modeling results. , 2006, Applied optics.

[21]  R. Bukata,et al.  Optical Properties and Remote Sensing of Inland and Coastal Waters , 1995 .

[22]  H. Gordon,et al.  Remote sensing optical properties of a stratified ocean: an improved interpretation. , 1980, Applied optics.

[23]  Antonio Ruiz-Verdú,et al.  Influence of phytoplankton pigment composition on remote sensing of cyanobacterial biomass , 2007 .

[24]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Quantitative detection of chlorophyll in cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing , 2004 .

[25]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Monitoring cyanobacterial blooms by satellite remote sensing , 2006 .

[26]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Comparison of different satellite sensors in detecting cyanobacterial bloom events in the Baltic Sea , 2006 .

[27]  R. Doerffer,et al.  Case studies on phytoplankton blooms in coastal and open waters of the Baltic Sea using Coastal Zone Color Scanner data , 1999 .

[28]  K. Kononen,et al.  Occurrence of the hepatotoxic cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea and structure of the toxin , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[29]  Tiit Kutser,et al.  Monitoring of algae blooms by optical remote sensing , 1997 .

[30]  Mati Kahru,et al.  Monitoring algal blooms : new techniques for detecting large-scale environmental change , 1997 .

[31]  D. Stramski,et al.  Effects of a nonuniform vertical profile of chlorophyll concentration on remote-sensing reflectance of the ocean. , 2005, Applied optics.

[32]  M. Defoin-Platel,et al.  How ambiguous is the inverse problem of ocean color in coastal waters , 2007 .