The effect of stance width on trunk kinematics and trunk kinetics during sagitally symmetric lifting

Abstract Lifting technique can have a significant impact on spine loading during lifting. The sports biomechanics literature has documented changes in trunk and lower extremity kinematics and muscle coactivation patterns as a function of stance width during high force dead lift and squat exercises. The focus of the current study was to explore whether these lifting stance width effects might translate into the occupational setting under more moderate load level conditions. Twelve subjects performed repetitions of a sagittally symmetric lifting and lowering task (10 kg load) under three stance width conditions: narrow (feet together), moderate (feet shoulder width) and wide (feet 150% of shoulder width). As they performed these exertions, trunk kinematics were captured using the lumbar motion monitor while the activity of the trunk muscles (erector spinae, rectus abdominis) and lower extremity muscles (gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis) were evaluated using normalized electromyography. The results showed that both the range of motion and peak acceleration in the sagittal plane were significantly affected by the stance width. The muscle activation levels, however, were not significantly affected by the stance width. These results collectively would indicate that the stance width effects seen in power lifting activities do not translate well into the occupational environment where more moderate loads are typically lifted. Relevance to industry Exploring alternative lifting strategies may provide an opportunity to reduce the incidence of low back disorders. Lifting stance width is one variable that has not been explored in the ergonomics literature.

[1]  F. Luyten,et al.  High inter-specimen variability of baseline data for the tibio-talar contact area. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  R W Norman,et al.  Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Zongliang Jiang,et al.  Influence of knee angle and individual flexibility on the flexion-relaxation response of the low back musculature. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  M. Adams,et al.  Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of five lifting techniques. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  R. Escamilla,et al.  An electromyographic analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  B. Bernard,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back , 1997 .

[8]  M. Adams,et al.  A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  S. McCaw,et al.  Stance width and bar load effects on leg muscle activity during the parallel squat. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Does an asymmetric straddle-legged lifting movement reduce the low-back load? , 1998 .

[11]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[12]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Repetitive lifting and spinal shrinkage, effects of age and lifting technique. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R F Escamilla,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  W C Hutton,et al.  Has the lumbar spine a margin of safety in forward bending? , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  R F Escamilla,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.