Distance-Based Aggregation Theory
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Felix Brandt,et al. Some Remarks on Dodgson's Voting Rule , 2009, Math. Log. Q..
[2] Hannu Nurmi,et al. Voting paradoxes and how to deal with them , 1999 .
[3] H. Young,et al. A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle , 1978 .
[4] Shmuel Nitzan,et al. The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment , 1979 .
[5] Yongsheng Xu. Non Binary Social Choice: A Brief Introduction , 1996 .
[6] Hannu Nurmi,et al. Discrepancies in the outcomes resulting from different voting schemes , 1988 .
[7] John G. Kemeny,et al. Mathematical models in the social sciences , 1964 .
[8] Sébastien Konieczny,et al. Distance Based Merging: A General Framework and some Complexity Results , 2002, KR.
[9] K. Bogart. Preference structures I: Distances between transitive preference relations† , 1973 .
[10] H. Young. Condorcet's Theory of Voting , 1988, American Political Science Review.
[11] A. Sen,et al. Social Choice Theory , 1980 .
[12] Piotr Faliszewski,et al. On the role of distances in defining voting rules , 2010, AAMAS.
[13] Geoffrey Pritchard,et al. Approximability of Dodgson’s rule , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..
[14] Olivier Hudry,et al. Metric and Latticial Medians , 2009, Decision-making Process.
[15] Ayzerman,et al. Theory of choice , 1995 .
[16] Wulf Gaertner,et al. Never choose the uniquely largest a characterization , 1996 .
[17] Christian Klamler. The Copeland rule and Condorcet’s principle , 2005 .
[18] P. Slater. Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons , 1961 .
[19] Bernard Monjardet,et al. The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory , 1981, Math. Soc. Sci..
[20] D. Saari. Geometry of voting , 1994 .
[21] Ariel D. Procaccia,et al. Socially desirable approximations for Dodgson's voting rule , 2010, EC.
[22] P. Fishburn. Condorcet Social Choice Functions , 1977 .
[23] Nick Baigent. Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice , 1987 .
[24] Norman Schofield,et al. Collective decision-making : social choice and political economy , 1996 .
[25] S. Shapiro,et al. Mathematics without Numbers , 1993 .
[26] D. Bouyssou,et al. Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference , 2002 .
[27] Jorge Alcalde-Unzu,et al. The Measurement of Consensus: An Axiomatic Analysis , 2008 .
[28] H. Nurmi. Comparing Voting Systems , 1987 .
[29] Christian Klamler,et al. The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny’s method and Slater’s rule , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..
[30] Donald G. Saari,et al. Disposing dictators, demystifying voting paradoxes , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..
[31] Fred R. McMorris,et al. Axiomatic Consensus Theory in Group Choice and Biomathematics , 2003 .
[32] D. Black. The theory of committees and elections , 1959 .
[33] Donald G. Saari,et al. A geometric examination of Kemeny's rule , 2000, Soc. Choice Welf..
[34] Daniel Eckert,et al. Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result , 2004 .
[35] Lawrence G. Sager,et al. Unpacking the Court , 1986 .
[36] A. Sen,et al. Chapter 22 Social choice theory , 1986 .
[37] Ariel D. Procaccia,et al. On the approximability of Dodgson and Young elections , 2009, Artif. Intell..
[38] Gabriella Pigozzi,et al. Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation , 2006, Synthese.
[39] M. Trick,et al. Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election , 1989 .
[40] Tommi Meskanen,et al. Distance from Consensus: A Theme and Variations , 2006 .
[41] Christian Klamler. On the Closeness Aspect of Three Voting Rules: Borda – Copeland – Maximin , 2005 .
[42] Christian Klamler. The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison , 2004, Math. Soc. Sci..
[43] Gabriella Pigozzi,et al. Belief merging, judgment aggregation and some links with social choice theory , 2005, Belief Change in Rational Agents.
[44] Jörg Rothe,et al. Exact analysis of Dodgson elections: Lewis Carroll's 1876 voting system is complete for parallel access to NP , 1997, JACM.
[45] Vincent Conitzer,et al. Improved Bounds for Computing Kemeny Rankings , 2006, AAAI.
[46] Christian List,et al. Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation , 2005, Soc. Choice Welf..
[47] F. Pukelsheim,et al. Mathematics and democracy : recent advances in voting systems and collective choice , 2006 .
[48] Hannu Nurmi,et al. A Comparison of Some Distance-Based Choice Rules in Ranking Environments , 2004 .
[49] Thomas C. Ratliff. A comparison of Dodgson's method and Kemeny's rule , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..
[50] Gabriella Pigozzi,et al. Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation , 2010, J. Log. Comput..
[51] Claude Lamboray. A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules , 2007, Math. Soc. Sci..
[52] Piotr Faliszewski,et al. On distance rationalizability of some voting rules , 2009, TARK '09.
[53] Thomas C. Ratliff. A comparison of Dodgson's method and the Borda count , 2002 .
[54] Christian Klamler,et al. A distance measure for choice functions , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..
[55] Daniel N. Osherson,et al. Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation , 2009, Soc. Choice Welf..
[56] Christian Klamler. On Some Distance Aspects in Social Choice Theory , 2006 .
[57] William S. Zwicker. Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average? , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..
[58] Sébastien Konieczny,et al. Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework , 2002, J. Log. Comput..