Triangles in ROC space: History and theory of “nonparametric” measures of sensitivity and response bias

Can accuracy and response bias in two-stimulus, two-response recognition or detection experiments be measured nonparametrically? Pollack and Norman (1964) answered this question affirmatively for sensitivity, Hodos (1970) for bias: Both proposed measures based on triangular areas in receiver-operating characteristic space. Their papers, and especially a paper by Grier (1971) that provided computing formulas for the measures, continue to be heavily cited in a wide range of content areas. In our sample of articles, most authors described triangle-based measures as making fewer assumptions than measures associated with detection theory. However, we show that statistics based on products or ratios of right triangle areas, including a recently proposed bias index and a not-yetproposed but apparently plausible sensitivity index, are consistent with a decision process based on logistic distributions. Even the Pollack and Norman measure, which is based on non-right triangles, is approximately logistic for low values of sensitivity. Simple geometric models for sensitivity and bias are not nonparametric, even if their implications are not acknowledged in the defining publications.

[1]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  D. Norman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DATA OBTAINED WITH DIFFERENT FALSE-ALARM RATES. , 1964, Psychological review.

[3]  William Hodos,et al.  Nonparametric index of response bias for use in detection and recognition experiments. , 1970 .

[4]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[5]  Laurence T. Maloney,et al.  Distributional Assumptions and Observed Conservatism in the Theory of Signal Detectability , 1991 .

[6]  J A Swets,et al.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[8]  T. Marill Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[9]  W. Donaldson Measuring recognition memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  N. Macmillan,et al.  Response bias : characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and nonparametric indexes , 1990 .

[11]  J. Swets Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. V. Bradley Distribution-Free Statistical Tests , 1968 .

[13]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[14]  David M. Green,et al.  General Prediction Relating Yes‐No and Forced‐Choice Results , 1964 .

[15]  Doris Aaronson,et al.  Extensions of Grier's computational formulas for A' and B'' to below-chance performance. , 1987 .

[16]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .