Identifying violent offenders using a video measure of interpersonal distance.

[1]  T. Hanlon,et al.  The Relationship Between Body Buffer Zone and Violence as Assessed By Subjective and Objective Techniques , 1978 .

[2]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[3]  F. Walkey,et al.  Comparative evaluation of a videotaped measure of interpersonal distance. , 1979, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  H. Hediger,et al.  Studies of the psychology and behaviour of captive animals in zoos and circuses. , 1956 .

[5]  F. N. Willis.  Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers’ relationship , 1966 .

[6]  Body-buffer zone and violence: a cross-cultural study. , 1976, The Journal of social psychology.

[7]  H. Hediger,et al.  Wild animals in captivity , 1950 .

[8]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad , 1968 .

[9]  R. Sommer.  Studies in Personal space , 1959 .

[10]  John R. Aiello,et al.  Field Study of the Proxemic Behavior of Young School Children in Three Subcultural Groups. , 1971 .

[11]  E. Hall.  The Silent Language , 1959 .

[12]  Stephen Nowicki,et al.  A new measure and social-learning model for interpersonal distance. , 1972 .

[13]  A. F. Kinzel.  Body-buffer zone in violent prisoners. , 1970, The American journal of psychiatry.

[14]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[15]  EVALUATION OF A METHOD OF PREDICTING VIOLENCE IN OFFENDERS , 1973 .

[16]  D. G. Morrison.  On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis , 1969 .

[17]  D. M. Pedersen.  Developmental Trends in Personal Space. , 1973, The Journal of psychology.

[18]  L. Derogatis,et al.  Body buffer zone and violence: a reassessment and confirmation. , 1971, The American journal of psychiatry.