In Play: A Commentary on Strategies in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election

Abstract“A lot of military battle plans going back to the Civil War say ‘whoever controls the Mississippi controls America.’ And Bush is marching straight up the Mississippi,” the Democratic strategist said. “We’ve just retreated from Louisiana, Arkansas and Missouri. They already control Mississippi, Tennessee and Kentucky. Bush is now moving in on Iowa and Wisconsin. And except for Illinois, which isn’t in play, there’s only one state left: Minnesota, the mouth of the river. And it’s dead even [i.e., a tie] there.” From CNN.com, ALLPOLITICS, September 23, 2004: Mercurio, John and Molly Levinson. “CNN Survey: Bush widens lead in Electoral College.” CNN Political Unit. 27 Sept. 2004 <http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/ 09/23/electoral.map>“All total, 21 states are in play. Some will bounce between “lean [toward a candidate]” to “tossup” throughout the campaign.” USA Today, July 25, 2004: “AP: Bush leads Kerry in electoral votes.” A.P. 25 July 2004, <whttp://www.usatoday.com/news/Politicselections/nation/President/2004-07-25-bush-kerry-electoral-votes_x.htm>

[1]  H. Chappell,et al.  Using state polls to forecast U.S. Presidential election outcomes , 2006 .

[2]  Oliver Alfred Gross,et al.  A Continuous Colonel Blotto Game , 1950 .

[3]  Larry M. Bartels.  Resource Allocation In a Presidential Campaign , 1985, Journal of Politics.

[4]  A Vote Equation and the 2004 Election , 2004 .

[5]  Scott L. Althaus,et al.  Candidate Appearances in Presidential Elections , 1972 – 2000 , 2007 .

[6]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  The Probability of Being President , 1993 .

[7]  Rejoinder to “Comment” by S. J. Brams and M. D. Davis , 1975 .

[8]  Ray C. Fair,et al.  The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President , 1978 .

[9]  Andrew Reeves,et al.  A Reassessment of “The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988–1996” , 2004, Journal of Politics.

[10]  S. Iyengar,et al.  New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988-1996 , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[12]  Scott L. Feld,et al.  Thinking About the Political Impacts of the Electoral College , 2005 .

[13]  Stuart Elaine Macdonald,et al.  The Power of the States in U.S. Presidential Elections , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Friedrich Schneider,et al.  The encyclopedia of public choice , 2004 .

[15]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  The electoral college vs. a direct vote: Policy bias, reversals, and indeterminate outcomes† , 1975 .

[16]  R. Myerson.  Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities Under Alternative Electoral Systems , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[17]  John H. Aldrich.  Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in America , 1995 .

[18]  T. Levesque,et al.  Campaign Resource Allocations Under the Electoral College , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  Packaging the Presidency: A History and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising , 1984 .

[21]  J. Barkley Rossner.  Rejoinder to Comment , 1995 .

[22]  Morton D. Davis,et al.  Comment on “Campaign Resource Allocations under the Electoral College” , 1975, American Political Science Review.