Ubiqutious transport systems: Negotiating context through a mobile-stationary interface

Ubiquitous computing environments grant organizations a multitude of dynamic digital traces composed of context signals emanating from embedded and mobile components. However, previous research indicates that the utility of context data is frequently hampered by a priori interpretations of context embodied within the acquiring technologies themselves. This paper reports an 18 month action research study seeking to rearrange an industry wide assemblage of stationary, mobile, and embedded technologies and associated organizations for the purpose of facilitating cross-organizational access to reinterpretable digital traces of context data. This was done by embedding the notion of seamfulness in an open standardized interface as a means to shift the locus of interpretation of context data in ubiquitous transport systems. In environments such as these, open access to context data is of essential importance to create opportunities for flexible interpretations of mobile work for uses not anticipated by preconfigured representations. However, this requirement essentially clashed with the business strategies of actors providing context data acquiring technology. This clash resulted in a negotiated design compromise of limited access and a well defined expansion of additional uses of context data between the involved actor groups. Addressing the issue of how organizations can derive value from context data, the contribution of this paper is an analysis of the complexity of accomplishing links between socio-technical elements in ubiquitous computing environments.

[1]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Running in Packs to Develop Knowledge-Intensive Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[3]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: The case of South Korea , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[6]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Jonny Holmström,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing and the Double Immutability of Remote Diagnostics Technology: An Exploration into Six Cases of Remote Diagnostics Technology Use , 2005, Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments.

[8]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Gateways—just as important as standards: How the internet won the “religious war” over standards in Scandinavia , 2001 .

[9]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[11]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  The Mobile–Stationary Divide in Ubiquitous Computing Environments: Lessons from the Transport Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Designing Work Oriented Infrastructures , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[13]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[15]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[16]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  The Role of Standards in Innovation , 2000 .

[19]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Assessing the Mobile-Stationary Divide in Ubiquitous Transport Systems , 2005, Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments.

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[23]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[24]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Designing Context-Aware Interaction: An Action Research Study , 2005, Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments.

[25]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Elgar Fleisch Von der Vernetzung von Unternehmen zur Vernetzung von Dingen , 2002 .

[27]  Joseph L. Kannry,et al.  Deriving Long-Term Value from Context-Aware Computing , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Theorizing about the Design of Information Infrastructures: Design Kernel Theories and Principles , 2008 .

[29]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..