Comparison of Infection Incidence Between Appendectomy Skin Incisions Sutured by Nylon and Polyglactin (Vicryl)

Background: Suturing quality and reducing its complications and resulting infection have always been a major concern of surgeons. Many of them have prohibited applying polyfilament and absorbable suturing materials. Objectives: In this study, we compared skin wound infection rate and other complications in two groups of post appendectomy patients whom were treated with two types of suturing materials - conventionally used Nylon and absorbable braided polyglactin (Vicryl) - and wound healing, existence of complication and recovery course of treated patients were surveyed. Patients and Methods: A total of 130 patients who underwent appendectomy were divided into two groups of 645 members, each. Patients in group A had their incisions closed by separate sutures (mattress method) by vicryl, while patients in group B had their surgical incisions were closed in the same method, by nylon sutures. Any signs and symptoms of surgical site wound infection like inappropriate pain, redness, discharge, bulging, and unhealing wound were checked during hospital stay and on the 7 th - 9 th day postoperatively. Results: The postsurgical complication and infections rates were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Vicryl sutures can safely be used for skin and subcutaneous wound suturing even when our surgery site is not ideally clean.

[1]  G. István,et al.  [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material]. , 2002, Magyar sebeszet.

[2]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites. , 2000, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[3]  A. Basiri,et al.  Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature. , 2011, Urology journal.

[4]  R. Delfini,et al.  Closure of skin or scalp with absorbable sutures. , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  B. Sancak,et al.  Effects of different suture materials on wound healing and infection in subcutaneous closure techniques. , 2009, B-ENT.

[6]  N. Gammelgaard,et al.  Wound complications after closure of abdominal incisions with Dexon or Vicryl. A randomized double-blind study. , 1983, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[7]  Chatchai Mingmalairak,et al.  Efficacy of antimicrobial coating suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl plus) compared with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis, double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[8]  Tomoyuki Abe,et al.  Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  J. Ciampolini,et al.  Adult hernia surgery in Wales revisited: impact of the guidelines of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. , 1998, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[10]  James M. Gerard,et al.  Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations , 2013, Pediatric emergency care.

[11]  C. Morgan-Hough,et al.  Comparing Wound Complication Rates following Closure of Hip Wounds with Metallic Skin Staples or Subcuticular Vicryl Suture: A Prospective Randomised Trial , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[12]  S. Gouin,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.