Licensing of nuclear power plants: The case of Sweden in an international comparison

Efficient power plant licensing procedures are essential for the functioning of deregulated electricity markets. The purpose of this paper is to review and analyse the licensing process for nuclear power plants in Sweden, and in part contrast the Swedish case with the corresponding approaches in a selection of other countries. This approach permits a discussion of how licensing processes can be altered and what the benefits and drawbacks of such changes are. The paper highlights and discusses a number of important legal issues and implications, including, for instance: (a) the role of political versus impartial decision-making bodies; (b) the tension between national policy goals and implementation at the local level; (c) public participation and access to justice; (d) consistency and clarity of the legal system; and (e) the introduction of license time limits.

[1]  A. Villemeur Measures for increasing life time , 2000 .

[2]  Gordon MacKerron,et al.  Nuclear costs: Why do they keep rising? , 1992 .

[3]  Danyel Reiche,et al.  Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states , 2004 .

[4]  Michael Rieber,et al.  The Cost of Switching Electricity Generation From Coal to Nuclear Fuel , 1991 .

[5]  G. Skogh,et al.  A European Nuclear Accident Pool , 2008 .

[6]  Ragnar E. Löfstedt Playing Politics with Energy Policy The Phace-out of Nucleur Power in Sweden , 2001 .

[7]  Kristina Ek Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power , 2005 .

[8]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation: From club-regulation to market competition in the Scandinavian electricity supply industry , 1996 .

[9]  Gabriel Michanek,et al.  Energirätt : En undersökning från mark- och miljörättslig utgångspunkt med sär­skild inriktning på frågor om energihushållning , 1990 .

[10]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Fuel flexibility in the West European power sector , 2000 .

[11]  E. Kahn,et al.  International comparisons of electricity regulation , 1996 .

[12]  K Barker,et al.  Barker review of land use planning - final report - recommendations , 2006 .

[13]  Per Hedberg,et al.  Åsikter om energi och kärnkraft , 2010 .

[14]  William J. Nuttall,et al.  An international comparison of regulatory organizations and licensing procedures for new nuclear power plants , 2008 .

[15]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Carbon abatement and new investment in liberalised electricity markets: a nuclear revival in the UK? , 2000 .

[16]  Jyrki Javanainen Nuclear installation licensing and democratic decision making in Finland: a case study regarding the Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant unit and the final disposal repository for spent nuclear fuel , 2006 .

[17]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind power development in Sweden: Global policies and local obstacles , 2007 .

[18]  Fredrik Pettersson,et al.  Climate policy and the social cost of power generation: Impacts of the Swedish national emissions target ☆ , 2008 .

[19]  René von Schomberg,et al.  Implementing the Precautionary Principle , 2006 .

[20]  Hans-Holger Rogner,et al.  The Economic Future of Nuclear Power in Competitive Markets , 2001 .