Using fuzzy numbers to propagate uncertainty in matrix-based LCI

Background, aim, and scopeAnalysis of uncertainties plays a vital role in the interpretation of life cycle assessment findings. Some of these uncertainties arise from parametric data variability in life cycle inventory analysis. For instance, the efficiencies of manufacturing processes may vary among different industrial sites or geographic regions; or, in the case of new and unproven technologies, it is possible that prospective performance levels can only be estimated. Although such data variability is usually treated using a probabilistic framework, some recent work on the use of fuzzy sets or possibility theory has appeared in the literature. The latter school of thought is based on the notion that not all data variability can be properly described in terms of frequency of occurrence. In many cases, it is necessary to model the uncertainty associated with the subjective degree of plausibility of parameter values. Fuzzy set theory is appropriate for such uncertainties. However, the computations required for handling fuzzy quantities has not been fully integrated with the formal matrix-based life cycle inventory analysis (LCI) described by Heijungs and Suh (2002).Materials and methodsThis paper integrates computations with fuzzy numbers into the matrix-based LCI computational model described in the literature. The approach uses fuzzy numbers to propagate the data variability in LCI calculations, and results in fuzzy distributions of the inventory results. The approach is developed based on similarities with the fuzzy economic input–output (EIO) model proposed by Buckley (Eur J Oper Res 39:54–60, 1989).ResultsThe matrix-based fuzzy LCI model is illustrated using three simple case studies. The first case shows how fuzzy inventory results arise in simple systems with variability in industrial efficiency and emissions data. The second case study illustrates how the model applies for life cycle systems with co-products, and thus requires the inclusion of displaced processes. The third case study demonstrates the use of the method in the context of comparing different carbon sequestration technologies.DiscussionThese simple case studies illustrate the important features of the model, including possible computational issues that can arise with larger and more complex life cycle systems.ConclusionsA fuzzy matrix-based LCI model has been proposed. The model extends the conventional matrix-based LCI model to allow for computations with parametric data variability represented as fuzzy numbers. This approach is an alternative or complementary approach to interval analysis, probabilistic or Monte Carlo techniques.Recommendations and perspectivesPotential further work in this area includes extension of the fuzzy model to EIO-LCA models and to life cycle impact assessment (LCIA); development of hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic approaches; and integration with life cycle-based optimization or decision analysis. Additional theoretical work is needed for modeling correlations of the variability of parameters using interacting or correlated fuzzy numbers, which remains an unresolved computational issue. Furthermore, integration of the fuzzy model into LCA software can also be investigated.

[1]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Reformulation of matrix-based LCI: From product balance to process balance , 2006 .

[2]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Efficient algorithms for Life Cycle Assessment, Input-Output Analysis, and Monte-Carlo Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[4]  Bengt Steen,et al.  A Statistical Approach for Estimation of Process Flow Data from Production of Chemicals of Fossil Origin (6 pp) , 2007 .

[5]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[6]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  A fuzzy linear programming extension of the general matrix-based life cycle model , 2008 .

[8]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[9]  C. Dujet,et al.  Possibility Theory: A New Approach to Uncertainty Analysis? (3 pp) , 2006 .

[10]  David Evans,et al.  How LCA studies deal with uncertainty , 2002 .

[11]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  Application of possibility theory in the life‐cycle inventory assessment of biofuels , 2002 .

[12]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[13]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  POLCAGE 1.0-a possibilistic life-cycle assessment model for evaluating alternative transportation fuels , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[15]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[16]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Multi-user test of the data quality matrix for product life cycle inventory data , 1998 .

[17]  Núria Agell,et al.  Fuzzy approach to life cycle impact assessment , 2006 .

[18]  Núria Agell,et al.  Fuzzy Approach to Life Cycle Impact Assessment An Application for Biowaste Management Systems , 2007 .

[19]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product , 2005 .

[20]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[21]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[22]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services , 2006 .

[23]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment , 1998 .

[24]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[25]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy input-output analysis , 1989 .

[26]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[27]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  On the meaning of fuzzy approach and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment , 2007 .

[28]  Jean-Luc Chevalier,et al.  Life cycle analysis with ill-defined data and its application to building products , 1996 .