Thresholds for inducing protective stepping responses to external perturbations of human standing.

Standing subjects were unexpectedly pulled forward to identify a threshold boundary that evokes stepping in terms of the size of the pull relative to the base of support (BoS). Performances in a range of sensorimotor tests were correlated with the threshold boundary parameters. Younger and older subjects were studied to identify age-related changes in stepping and the threshold boundaries. The threshold boundary had a forward limit (T(L)) that, when crossed, always made subjects step no matter how slowly they were pulled. As velocity increased, the threshold position that produced a step shifted nearer to the ankles. Eventually a pull velocity was reached above which velocity had no further effect and a position threshold (T(H)) was identified behind which subjects never stepped. Thus the position threshold boundary for stepping is a posterior-going sigmoidal function of perturbation velocity. Older subjects stepped more than the young (69% vs. 40% of trials). For the older subjects, T(L) (91% vs. 107% BoS) and T(H) (59% vs. 72% BoS) were closer to the ankles, and the transition between T(L) and T(H) occurred at lower velocities (96% vs. 121% BoS.s(-1)). Across the entire study population many sensorimotor factors were associated with T(L) and T(H). However, these associations were not present when age was removed as a factor. Thus, although the older subjects use protective stepping more often, this cannot be attributed directly to the sensorimotor factors tested here. It can be explained by stepping as a triggered response to the perturbation event rather than later sensory input about body movement.

[1]  S. Rossignol,et al.  On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats , 1978, Brain Research.

[2]  K. Pearson,et al.  Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats , 1980, Brain Research.

[3]  H. Skinner,et al.  Age‐related Decline in Proprioception , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  L. Nashner,et al.  The organization of human postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Sensorimotor deficits related to postural stability. Implications for falling in the elderly. , 1985, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[6]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Kenshalo Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  A. Welford,et al.  Reaction Time, Speed of Performance, and Age , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Lord,et al.  Postural stability and associated physiological factors in a population of aged persons. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  W. E. McIlroy,et al.  Task constraints on foot movement and the incidence of compensatory stepping following perturbation of upright stance , 1993, Brain Research.

[11]  S R Lord,et al.  Physical activity program for older persons: effect on balance, strength, neuromuscular control, and reaction time. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Schultz,et al.  Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  M Schieppati,et al.  The limits of equilibrium in young and elderly normal subjects and in parkinsonians. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Judge,et al.  Functional base of support decreases with age. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[15]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[16]  M. Rogers,et al.  Stimulus parameters and inertial load: effects on the incidence of protective stepping responses in healthy human subjects. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Charles Capaday,et al.  Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Y. Pai,et al.  Center of mass velocity-position predictions for balance control. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  B. E. Maki,et al.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[20]  Y. Pai,et al.  Static versus dynamic predictions of protective stepping following waist-pull perturbations in young and older adults. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M. W. Rogers,et al.  A closed-loop stepper motor waist-pull system for inducing protective stepping in humans. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  F. Horak,et al.  Role of vestibular information in initiation of rapid postural responses , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attentional demands and postural recovery: the effects of aging. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  Perception of postural limits in elderly nursing home and day care participants. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[25]  Wynne A. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of a model that determines the stability limits of dynamic balance. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[26]  B E Maki,et al.  Age-related differences in laterally directed compensatory stepping behavior. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  Wynne A. Lee,et al.  Relative stability improves with experience in a dynamic standing task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Y C Pai,et al.  Thresholds for step initiation induced by support-surface translation: a dynamic center-of-mass model provides much better prediction than a static model. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Y. Pai,et al.  Predicted region of stability for balance recovery: motion at the knee joint can improve termination of forward movement. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  D. Krebs,et al.  Vestibulopathy and the age effects on protective stepping during unperturbed standing. , 2000, Motor control.

[31]  B. E. Maki,et al.  The role of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the control of compensatory stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable, multi-directional perturbation , 2000, Brain Research.

[32]  M W Rogers,et al.  Lateral stability during forward-induced stepping for dynamic balance recovery in young and older adults. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[33]  The influence of stimulus cue on the initiation of stepping in young and older adults. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  H. Kinoshita,et al.  Age-related differences in postural control in humans in response to a sudden deceleration generated by postural disturbance , 2001, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[35]  J P Roll,et al.  Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Yi-Chung Pai,et al.  Feedforward adaptations are used to compensate for a potential loss of balance , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  Effects of age and gender on toe flexor muscle strength. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[38]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  A. Vandervoort Aging of the human neuromuscular system , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[40]  D. Farina,et al.  Effect of age on muscle functions investigated with surface electromyography , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[41]  Mark W Rogers,et al.  Triggering of protective stepping for the control of human balance: age and contextual dependence. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  D. I. McCloskey,et al.  Accuracy of voluntary movements at the thumb and elbow joints , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.