Endobronchial Valve (Zephyr) Treatment in Homogeneous Emphysema: One-Year Results from the IMPACT Randomized Clinical Trial

Rationale: The long-term safety and effectiveness of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr endobronchial valves in subjects with severe homogeneous emphysema with little to no collateral ventilation beyond 3 months have yet to be established. Methods: Ninety-three subjects were randomized to either bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves or standard of care (SoC) (1:1). Zephyr valve subjects were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. SoC subjects were assessed at 3 and 6 months; they were then offered crossover to Zephyr valve treatment. Results: The mean group difference (Zephyr valve – SoC) for change in FEV1 from baseline to 6 months was 16.3 ± 22.1% (mean ± SD; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed the mean between-group difference for the six-minute walk distance of +28.3 ± 55.3 m (p = 0.016); St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, −7.51 ± 9.56 points (p < 0.001); modified Medical Research Council, −0.42 ± 0.81 points (p = 0.019); BODE index, −0.85 ± 1.39 points (p = 0.006); and residual volume of −430 ± 830 mL (p = 0.011) in favor of the Zephyr valve group. At 6 months, there were significantly more responders based on the minimal clinically important difference for these same measures in the Zephyr valve versus the SoC group. The clinical benefits were persistent at 12 months. The percentage of subjects with respiratory serious adverse events was higher in the Zephyr valve group compared to SoC during the first 30 days post-procedure but not statistically different for the Zephyr valve and SoC groups from 31 days to 6 months, and stable in the Zephyr valve group out to 12 months. There were 2 deaths in the SoC group in the 31-day to 6-month period and none in the Zephyr valve group out to 12 months. Conclusions: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in subjects with severe homogeneous emphysema and little to no collateral ventilation provides clinically meaningful change from baseline in lung function, quality of life, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and the BODE index at 6 months, with benefits maintained out to 12 months.

[1]  F. Herth,et al.  Endobronchial Valves for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Best Practice Recommendations from Expert Panel on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction , 2016, Respiration.

[2]  D. Slebos,et al.  One-Year Follow-Up after Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Patients with Emphysema without Collateral Ventilation Treated in the STELVIO Trial , 2016, Respiration.

[3]  F. Herth,et al.  Endobronchial Valve Therapy in Patients with Homogeneous Emphysema. Results from the IMPACT Study. , 2016, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  J. Soriano,et al.  Global burden of COPD , 2016, Respirology.

[5]  E. V. van Rikxoort,et al.  Endobronchial Valves for Emphysema without Interlobar Collateral Ventilation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. Hansell,et al.  Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves for patients with heterogeneous emphysema and intact interlobar fissures (the BeLieVeR-HIFi study): a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[7]  F. Herth,et al.  Predictors of clinical outcome in emphysema patients with atelectasis following endoscopic valve therapy: A retrospective study , 2015, Respirology.

[8]  Jovilė Raudoniūtė,et al.  Novel aspects of pathogenesis and regeneration mechanisms in COPD , 2015, International Journal of COPD.

[9]  G. Criner,et al.  Expert Statement: Pneumothorax Associated with Endoscopic Valve Therapy for Emphysema - Potential Mechanisms, Treatment Algorithm, and Case Examples , 2014, Respiration.

[10]  G. Criner,et al.  Target lobe volume reduction and COPD outcome measures after endobronchial valve therapy , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[11]  Takeshi Kubo,et al.  Emphysema distribution and annual changes in pulmonary function in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2012, Respiratory Research.

[12]  M. Noppen,et al.  Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in a European cohort , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[13]  G. McLennan,et al.  A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Heussel,et al.  Bronchoskopische Lungenvolumenreduktion bei Patienten mit schwerem homogenem Lungenemphysem: eine Pilotstudie , 2009, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[15]  D. Postma,et al.  ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in normal and pathological lung , 2005, Respiratory research.

[16]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Patients at high risk of death after lung-volume-reduction surgery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Endobronchial valve insertion to reduce lung volume in emphysema , 2022 .