A Systematic Review of Usability Evaluation in Web Development

The challenge of developing more usable Web applications has motivated the appearance of a number of techniques, methods and tools to address Web usability issues. Although there are many proposals for supporting the development of usable Web applications, many developers are not aware of them and many organizations do not properly apply them. This paper reports on a systematic review of the use of usability evaluation methods in Web development. The objective of the review is to investigate what usability evaluation methods have been employed by researchers to evaluate Web artifacts and how they were employed. A total of 51 research papers have been reviewed from an initial set of 410 papers. The results show that 45% of the papers reviewed reported the use of evaluation methods specifically crafted for the Web and that the most employed method is user testing. In addition, the results of the review have identified several research gaps. Specifically, 80% of the evaluations are still performed at the implementation phase of Web applications development and 47% of the papers did not present any validation of the usability evaluation method(s) employed.

[1]  Gottfried Vossen,et al.  Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE) , 2009 .

[2]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Software Metrics : A Rigorous and Practical Approach , 1998 .

[3]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Web Information Systems Engineering - WISE 2007 Workshops, WISE 2007 International Workshops, Nancy, France, December 3, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, WISE Workshops.

[4]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  Rapid Application Design and Testing of Web Usability , 2002, IEEE Multim..

[5]  Giovanni Toffetti Carughi,et al.  Web Usability: Principles and Evaluation Methods , 2006, Web Engineering.

[6]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Web Engineering , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for Web site attractiveness and usability , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  C. M. Neuwirth,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction - usability and the web , 2002 .

[9]  Susan Harkness Regli,et al.  Usability and the Web , 2002 .

[10]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[11]  San Murugesan Web engineering , 1999, LINK.

[12]  Marilyn Hughes Blackmon,et al.  Cognitive walkthrough for the web , 2002, CHI.

[13]  Juan Manuel Cueva Lovelle,et al.  Comparison of Methods and Existing Tools for the Measurement of Usability in the Web , 2003, ICWE.

[14]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development , 2005, CHI.

[15]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[16]  Ram R. Bishu,et al.  Web Usability and Evaluation: Issues and Concerns , 2007, HCI.

[17]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  Usability and internationalization , 2007 .

[18]  Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes,et al.  Techniques for developing more accessible web applications: a survey towards a process classification , 2007, SIGDOC '07.

[19]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Two psychology-based usability inspection techniques studied in a diary experiment , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[20]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+ , 2007, WISE Workshops.

[21]  Nuray Aykin,et al.  HCI and culture , 2007 .

[22]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  A systematic review of Web engineering research , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005..