Co-operative Inquiry: Reflections on Practice

Co-operative inquiry (CI) is a form of action research which emphasises participation. This paper discusses CI as a research methodology. An overview is given and then greater detail is provided using as a vehicle my use of CI in a particular research study. This study explored whether conventionally-educated systems developers could adopt a richer model of organisations by using metaphors for organisations as cognitive structuring devices. Finally some reflections are given on the challenges CI poses for both individual researchers and the wider academic community.

[1]  M. Theunissen.  The other , 1984 .

[2]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[3]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[4]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Peter Reason,et al.  Human inquiry: Steps towards emancipatory practice , 1996 .

[6]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[7]  Kim Halskov Madsen,et al.  Breakthrough by Breakdown: Metaphors and Structured Domains , 1988 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[9]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective systems design and requirements analysis : the ETHICS approach , 1995 .

[10]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[11]  P. Reason,et al.  Human inquiry : a sourcebook of new paradigm research , 1983 .

[12]  P. Reason.  Human inquiry in action : developments in new paradigm research , 1988 .

[13]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Organizational metaphors and information systems research , 1991 .

[14]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[15]  David W. Allbritton,et al.  When Metaphors Function as Schemas: Some Cognitive Effects of Conceptual Metaphors , 1995 .

[16]  J. Heron.  Co-Operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition , 1996 .

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[18]  Peter Reason.  Human inquiry as discipline and practice. , 1994 .

[19]  Donal Flynn,et al.  A Preliminary Account of a Case Study Approach to Understanding Factors that Shape the Requirements Process in an NHS Hospital , 1999 .

[20]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[21]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[22]  Peter Reason,et al.  Participation in human inquiry , 1994 .

[23]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[24]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A descriptive framework for investigating problems in the application of systems development methodologies , 1995 .

[25]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Action research in organisations , 2000 .

[26]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[27]  Kim Halskov,et al.  A guide to metaphorical design , 1994, CACM.

[28]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[29]  Andrea Gregg,et al.  Learning From Doing: Lessons Learned From Designing and Developing an Educational Software Within a Heterogeneous Group , 2021, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[30]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[31]  Peter Reason,et al.  CO-OPERATIVE INQUIRY, PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH & ACTION INQUIRY: THREE APPROACHES TO PARTICIPATIVE INQUIRY , 1994 .

[32]  C. Pinder,et al.  Contrasting Philosophical Perspectives in Administrative Science: A Reply to Morgan. , 1983 .

[33]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Whose job is it anyway?: organizational information competencies for value creation , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Briony J. Oates,et al.  Participation in Information Systems Research , 1999 .

[37]  Peter Aiken,et al.  Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1997 .

[38]  C. Oswick,et al.  Metaphor and organizations , 1996 .

[39]  Yvonna S. Lincoln.  From the discourse of “the other” to the other discourse: stakeholder‐based models of evaluation and the human side of social welfare , 1998 .

[40]  G. Morgan,et al.  Imaginization:The Art of Creative Management , 1993 .

[41]  M. Black.  More about metaphor , 1977 .

[42]  Cynthia Stewart.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action : Donald A. Schon, Basic Books, New York, 1983 , 1984 .

[43]  K. E. Kendall,et al.  Metaphors and their meaning for information systems development , 1994 .

[44]  Julie E. Kendall,et al.  Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond the Systems Machine , 1993, MIS Q..