FFCD-1004 Clinical Trial: Impact of Cytidine Deaminase Activity on Clinical Outcome in Gemcitabine-Monotherapy Treated Patients

Purpose Because cytidine deaminase (CDA) is the key enzyme in gemcitabine metabolism, numerous studies have attempted to investigate impact of CDA status (i.e. genotype or phenotype) on clinical outcome. To date, data are still controversial because none of these studies has fully investigated genotype-phenotype CDA status, pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome relationships in gemcitabine-treated patients. Besides, most patients were treated with gemcitabine associated with other drugs, thus adding a confounding factor. We performed a multicenter prospective clinical trial in gemcitabine-treated patients which aimed at investigating the link between CDA deficiency on the occurrence of severe toxicities and on pharmacokinetics, and studying CDA genotype-phenotype relationships. Experimental design One hundred twenty patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma eligible for adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy were enrolled in this study promoted and managed by the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive. Toxicities were graded according to National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. They were considered severe for grade ≥ 3, and early when occurring during the first eight weeks of treatment. CDA status was evaluated using a double approach: genotyping for 79A>C and functional testing. Therapeutic drug monitoring of gemcitabine and its metabolite were performed on the first course of gemcitabine. Results Five patients out of 120 (i.e., 4.6%) were found to be CDA deficient (i.e., CDA activity <1.3 U/mg), and only one among them experienced early severe hematological toxicity. There was no statistically significant difference in CDA activity between patients experiencing hematological severe toxicities (28.44%) and patients who tolerated the treatment (71.56%). CDA genetic analysis failed in evidencing an impact in terms of toxicities or in CDA activity. Regarding pharmacokinetics, a wide inter-individual variability has been observed in patients. Conclusion This study, which included only 4.6% of CDA-deficient patients, failed in identifying CDA status as a predictive marker of toxicities with gemcitabine. A lack of statistical power because of smoothing effect of CDA variability as compared with real life conditions could explain this absence of impact. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01416662

[1]  G. Milano,et al.  Role of cytidine deaminase in toxicity and efficacy of nucleosidic analogs , 2015, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[2]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Xiuwen Wang,et al.  The Impact of CDA A79C Gene Polymorphisms on the Response and Hematologic Toxicity in Gemcitabine-Treated Patients: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, The International journal of biological markers.

[4]  S. Vilar,et al.  Corrigendum to “Human cytidine deaminase: A biochemical characterization of its naturally occurring variants” [Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 63 (2014) 64–74] , 2014 .

[5]  S. Vilar,et al.  Human cytidine deaminase: a biochemical characterization of its naturally occurring variants. , 2014, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[6]  J. Berlin,et al.  Treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a review. , 2014, Oncology.

[7]  L. Ouafik,et al.  Rapid deaminator status is associated with poor clinical outcome in pancreatic cancer patients treated with a gemcitabine-based regimen. , 2013, Pharmacogenomics.

[8]  B. Ring,et al.  Pharmacogenomics of Gemcitabine Metabolism: Functional Analysis of Genetic Variants in Cytidine Deaminase and Deoxycytidine Kinase , 2013, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[9]  Shouhong Gao,et al.  Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of seven commonly used anticancer drugs in human plasma. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[10]  D. Wazer,et al.  Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. , 2014, JOP : Journal of the pancreas.

[11]  L. Crinò,et al.  Association of Cytidine Deaminase and Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Polymorphisms with Response, Toxicity, and Survival in Cisplatin/Gemcitabine-Treated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  J. Schellens,et al.  Part 2: pharmacogenetic variability in drug transport and phase I anticancer drug metabolism. , 2011, The oncologist.

[13]  H. Ueno,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite in Japanese Cancer Patients , 2010, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[14]  H. Groen,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: impact of the 79A>C cytidine deaminase polymorphism , 2010, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[15]  N. André,et al.  Cytidine deaminase residual activity in serum is a predictive marker of early severe toxicities in adults after gemcitabine-based chemotherapies. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  E. Giovannetti,et al.  Correlation Between Cytidine Deaminase Genotype and Gemcitabine Deamination in Blood Samples , 2008, Nucleosides, nucleotides & nucleic acids.

[17]  E. Giovannetti,et al.  Correlation of CDA, ERCC1, and XPD Polymorphisms with Response and Survival in Gemcitabine/Cisplatin–Treated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  M. Links,et al.  Population pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its metabolite in patients with cancer: effect of oxaliplatin and infusion rate. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  H. Ueno,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in Japanese cancer patients: the impact of a cytidine deaminase polymorphism. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  R. Ferrell,et al.  Identification of functional single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in the cytidine deaminase promoter , 2006, Human Genetics.

[21]  G. Peters,et al.  Sequence dependent effect of paclitaxel on gemcitabine metabolism in relation to cell cycle and cytotoxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  J. Neoptolemos,et al.  Adjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer , 2015 .

[23]  A. Collins,et al.  Molecular epidemiology in cancer research. , 1998, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[24]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  J. Laliberté,et al.  Kinetic studies on 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) with purified human deoxycytidine kinase and cytidine deaminase. , 1993, Biochemical pharmacology.