Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997–2003

Wide variation in the surgical management of breast cancer exists at hospital, regional, national and international level. To demonstrate whether variation in surgical practice observed at aggregate level between breast units persists following adjustment for case-mix, individual patient-level data from the Trent Breast Screening Programme Quality Assurance database (1997–2003) was analysed. Expected case-mix adjusted mastectomy rates were derived by logistic regression using the variables tumour size, site and grade, patient age and year of presentation, employing the region's overall case-mix adjusted practice as the reference population. The region's 11 breast screening units detected 5109 (3989 invasive) surgically managed primary breast cancers over the 6-year period. A total of 1828 mastectomies (Mx) were performed (Mx rate 35.8%, 95% confidence interval: 34.5–37.1%). Significant variation in mastectomy rates were observed between units (range 25–45%, P<0.0001), and persists following case-mix adjustment (P<0.0001). Two-fold variation in observed to expected unit mastectomy rate coefficient is demonstrated overall (range 0.66–1.36), increasing to almost four-fold variation in cancers less than 15 mm diameter (range 0.55–1.95). Significant variation in surgery for screen-detected primary breast cancer is not explained by case-mix. Further research is required to investigate potential patient and professional causative factors.

[1]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  P Maguire,et al.  Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer , 1994, BMJ.

[3]  Richard Sylvester,et al.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  M. Stewart Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  I. Olivotto,et al.  Patterns of initial management of node-negative breast cancer in two Canadian provinces. British Columbia/Ontario Working Group. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? , 1999, BMJ.

[7]  J F Wilson,et al.  Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[9]  Wolberg Wh Mastectomy or breast conservation in the management of primary breast cancer: psychosocial factors. , 1990 .

[10]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Offering choice of treatment to patients with cancers. A review based on a symposium held at the 10th annual conference of The British Psychosocial Oncology Group, December 1993. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[11]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Pain,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. , 1992, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  Goodwin,et al.  Geographic and Hospital Variation in the Management of Older Women With Breast Cancer. , 1994, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[14]  W. Wolberg Mastectomy or breast conservation in the management of primary breast cancer: psychosocial factors. , 1990, Oncology.

[15]  G. Lawrence,et al.  The National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and British Association of Surgical Oncology audit of quality assurance in breast screening 1996–2001 , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  C. Naylor,et al.  Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.