Characterization of meiotic crossovers and gene conversion by whole-genome sequencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BackgroundMeiotic recombination alters frequency and distribution of genetic variation, impacting genetics and evolution. In the budding yeast, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and D loops form either crossovers (COs) or non-crossovers (NCOs), which occur at many sites in the genome. Differences at the nucleotide level associated with COs and NCOs enable us to detect these recombination events and their distributions.ResultsWe used high throughput sequencing to uncover over 46 thousand single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between two budding yeast strains and investigated meiotic recombinational events. We provided a detailed analysis of CO and NCO events, including number, size range, and distribution on chromosomes. We have detected 91 COs, very close to the average number from previous genetic studies, as well as 21 NCO events and mapped the positions of these events with high resolution. We have obtained DNA sequence-level evidence for a wide range of sizes of chromosomal regions involved in CO and NCO events. We show that a large fraction of the COs are accompanied by gene conversion (GC), indicating that meiotic recombination changes allelic frequencies, in addition to redistributing existing genetic variations.ConclusionThis work is the first reported study of meiotic recombination using high throughput sequencing technologies. Our results show that high-throughput sequencing is a sensitive method to uncover at single-base resolution details of CO and NCO events, including some complex patterns, providing new clues about the mechanism of this fundamental process.

[1]  Neil Hunter,et al.  RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[2]  T. Nakagawa,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MER3 gene, encoding a novel helicase‐like protein, is required for crossover control in meiosis , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Jennifer L. Nemhauser,et al.  In: The Arabidopsis Book , 2002 .

[4]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[5]  N. M. Hollingsworth,et al.  The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. , 2004, Genes & development.

[6]  Gerald R. Smith,et al.  Single Holliday Junctions Are Intermediates of Meiotic Recombination , 2006, Cell.

[7]  A. Burt PERSPECTIVE: SEX, RECOMBINATION, AND THE EFFICACY OF SELECTION—WAS WEISMANN RIGHT? , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  D. Bentley,et al.  Whole-genome re-sequencing. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[9]  G. Roeder Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. , 1997, Genes & development.

[10]  G. Copenhaver,et al.  Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. , 2002, Genetics.

[11]  N. Kleckner,et al.  The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. , 1998, Annual review of genetics.

[12]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast , 2008, Nature.

[13]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes , 2004, Genome Biology.

[14]  Roeder Gs Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango , 1997 .

[15]  Neil Hunter,et al.  BLM Ortholog, Sgs1, Prevents Aberrant Crossing-over by Suppressing Formation of Multichromatid Joint Molecules , 2007, Cell.

[16]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination , 1983, Cell.

[17]  M. Lichten,et al.  Meiotic recombination: Breaking the genome to save it , 2001, Current Biology.

[18]  O. Mazina,et al.  Rad54 protein promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions , 2006, Nature.

[19]  N. M. Hollingsworth,et al.  MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. , 1995, Genes & development.

[20]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  W. J. Dickinson,et al.  A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  F. Stahl,et al.  Crossover interference in humans. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  S. Keeney,et al.  Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. , 2001, Current topics in developmental biology.

[25]  S. Pratt,et al.  Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Hong Ma A Molecular Portrait of Arabidopsis Meiosis , 2006, The arabidopsis book.

[27]  G. Magni THE ORIGIN OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS DURING MEIOSIS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Lichten,et al.  Mapping Meiotic Single-Strand DNA Reveals a New Landscape of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, PLoS biology.

[29]  R. V. von Borstel,et al.  Different Rates of Spontaneous Mutation during Mitosis and Meiosis in Yeast. , 1962, Genetics.

[30]  J. Arthur Thomson,et al.  The Evolution Theory , 2022 .

[31]  R H Borts,et al.  A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[32]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, Nature.

[33]  James R. Knight,et al.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors , 2005, Nature.

[34]  J. Grimsby,et al.  Genetic diversity and clonal vs. sexual reproduction in Fallopia spp. (Polygonaceae). , 2007, American journal of botany.

[35]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Molecular-Genetic Biodiversity in a Natural Population of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae From “Evolution Canyon”: Microsatellite Polymorphism, Ploidy and Controversial Sexual Status , 2006, Genetics.