Optimal Model Order Selection for Transient Error Autoregressive Moving Average (TERA) MRI Reconstruction Method

An alternative approach to the use of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) recon- struction is the use of parametric modeling technique. This method is suitable for problems in which the image can be modeled by explicit known source functions with a few adjustable parameters. Despite the success reported in the use of modeling technique as an alternative MRI reconstruction technique, two important problems constitutes challenges to the applicability of this method, these are estimation of Model order and model coefficient determination. In this paper, five of the suggested method of evaluating the model order have been evaluated, these are: The Final Prediction Error (FPE), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Residual Variance (RV), Minimum Description Length (MDL) and Hannan and Quinn (HNQ) criterion. These criteria were evaluated on MRI data sets based on the method of Transient Error Reconstruction Algorithm (TERA). The result for each criterion is compared to result obtained by the use of a fixed order technique and three measures of similarity were evaluated. Result obtained shows that the use of MDL gives the highest measure of similarity to that use by a fixed order technique. Keywords—Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Parametric modeling, Transient Error.

[1]  T. Mathews,et al.  Objective image quality measures for evaluating advanced MRI reconstruction methods , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[2]  T. R. Gosnell,et al.  Digital Image Reconstruction: Deblurring and Denoising , 2005 .

[3]  H. Akaike Power spectrum estimation through autoregressive model fitting , 1969 .

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  S. T. Nichols,et al.  A quantitative comparison of the TERA modeling and DFT magnetic resonance image reconstruction techniques , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  Principles of magnetic resonance imaging : a signal processing perspective , 1999 .

[8]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[9]  Paul C. Lauterbur,et al.  Principles of magnetic resonance imaging : a signal processing perspective , 1999 .

[10]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[11]  Ramaswamy Palaniappan,et al.  Towards Optimal Model Order Selection for Autoregressive Spectral Analysis of Mental Tasks Using Genetic Algorithm , 2006 .

[12]  Nicolas H. Younan,et al.  JPEG2000: IMAGE QUALITY METRICS , 2005 .

[13]  S. T. Nichols,et al.  Application of Autoregressive Moving Average Parametric Modeling in Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Superresolution reconstruction through object modeling and parameter estimation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[15]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .