Network communication models improve the behavioral and functional predictive utility of the human structural connectome

The connectome provides a structural substrate facilitating communication between brain regions. We aimed to establish whether accounting for polysynaptic communication paths in structural connectomes would improve prediction of interindividual variation in behavior as well as increase structure-function coupling strength. Structural connectomes were mapped for 889 healthy adults participating in the Human Connectome Project. To account for polysynaptic signaling, connectomes were transformed into communication matrices for each of 15 different network communication models. Communication matrices were (i) used to perform predictions of five data-driven behavioral dimensions and (ii) correlated to interregional resting-state functional connectivity (FC). While FC was the most accurate predictor of behavior, network communication models, in particular communicability and navigation, improved the performance of structural connectomes. Accounting for polysynaptic communication also significantly strengthened structure-function coupling, with the navigation and shortest paths models leading to 35-65% increases in association strength with FC. Combining behavioral and functional results into a single ranking of communication models positioned navigation as the top model, suggesting that it may more faithfully recapitulate underlying neural signaling patterns. We conclude that network communication models augment the functional and behavioral predictive utility of the human structural connectome and contribute to narrowing the gap between brain structure and function.

[1]  Bratislav Misic,et al.  Signal propagation via cortical hierarchies , 2020, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Breakspear Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Path ensembles and a tradeoff between communication efficiency and resilience in the human connectome , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[4]  Michael Erb,et al.  Linking structural and effective brain connectivity: structurally informed Parametric Empirical Bayes (si-PEB) , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[5]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network-Based Asymmetry of the Human Auditory System , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  The effect of network thresholding and weighting on structural brain networks in the UK Biobank , 2019, NeuroImage.

[7]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[8]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Validation of Network Communicability Metrics for the Analysis of Brain Structural Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Sustaining the Internet with Hyperbolic Mapping , 2010, Nature communications.

[13]  Michael M. Craig,et al.  Structural optimality and neurogenetic expression mediate functional dynamics in the human brain , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core , 2016, bioRxiv.

[18]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain , 2017, bioRxiv.

[19]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Communication dynamics in complex brain networks , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[21]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  A Network Convergence Zone in the Hippocampus , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Synchronization lag in post stroke: relation to motor function and structural connectivity , 2019, Network Neuroscience.

[24]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography , 2017, Nature Communications.

[28]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Navigability of Complex Networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[29]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  D. Higham,et al.  A weighted communicability measure applied to complex brain networks , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[33]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior , 2019, NeuroImage.

[35]  Enrico Amico,et al.  Mapping hybrid functional-structural connectivity traits in the human connectome , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[36]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Searchability of networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Communication in Neuronal Networks , 2003, Science.

[39]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[40]  Evgeny J. Chumin,et al.  Towards a mathematical theory of communication for the human connectome , 2019, 1911.02601.

[41]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions , 2012, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[42]  Alain Giron,et al.  Predicting functional connectivity from structural connectivity via computational models using MRI: An extensive comparison study , 2015, NeuroImage.

[43]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[44]  K. Jamison,et al.  Longitudinal increases in structural connectome segregation and functional connectome integration are associated with better recovery after mild TBI , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[45]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Laura E. Suárez,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics , 2020, NeuroImage.

[48]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Imaging-based parcellations of the human brain , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  PHRENOLOGY : What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us About Distributed Circuitry ? , 2005 .

[50]  Fernando Calamante,et al.  The contribution of geometry to the human connectome , 2016, NeuroImage.

[51]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Navigation of brain networks , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  O. Sporns,et al.  From regions to connections and networks: new bridges between brain and behavior , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[54]  M. Weiner,et al.  A Network Diffusion Model of Disease Progression in Dementia , 2012, Neuron.

[55]  Arnaud Messé,et al.  Parcellation influence on the connectivity‐based structure–function relationship in the human brain , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[56]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Network analysis of whole-brain fMRI dynamics: A new framework based on dynamic communicability , 2019, NeuroImage.

[57]  T. Ge,et al.  Resting brain dynamics at different timescales capture distinct aspects of human behavior , 2019, Nature Communications.

[58]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[59]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Simple models of human brain functional networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  D. Bassett,et al.  Spatial Embedding Imposes Constraints on Neuronal Network Architectures , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Linking Structure and Function in Macroscale Brain Networks , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[64]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? , 2019, NeuroImage.

[65]  J. Rapoport,et al.  The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  H. Voss,et al.  Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[67]  Anbupalam Thalamuthu,et al.  The independent influences of age and education on functional brain networks and cognition in healthy older adults , 2017, bioRxiv.

[68]  Boris C. Bernhardt,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition , 2013, Science.

[70]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[71]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Cooperative and Competitive Spreading Dynamics on the Human Connectome , 2015, Neuron.

[72]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Communicability in complex networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[73]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Wiring cost and topological participation of the mouse brain connectome , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[76]  Javier M. Buldú,et al.  Beware of the Small-World Neuroscientist! , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[77]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[78]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[79]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Cognitive Network Neuroscience , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  C. Sripada,et al.  Prediction of neurocognition in youth from resting state fMRI , 2019, Molecular Psychiatry.

[81]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Multilayer network switching rate predicts brain performance , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  The Rhesus Monkey Connectome Predicts Disrupted Functional Networks Resulting from Pharmacogenetic Inactivation of the Amygdala , 2016, Neuron.

[83]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Exploring the Morphospace of Communication Efficiency in Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[84]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network-Level Structure-Function Relationships in Human Neocortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[85]  Antoine Allard,et al.  Navigable maps of structural brain networks across species , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[86]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Structural, geometric and genetic factors predict interregional brain connectivity patterns probed by electrocorticography , 2019, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[87]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Inferring neural signalling directionality from undirected structural connectomes , 2019, Nature Communications.

[88]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[89]  Enrico Amico,et al.  Modeling Communication Processes in the Human Connectome through Cooperative Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[90]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[91]  Haijun Zhou Network landscape from a Brownian particle's perspective. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.