The effects of tactile feedback and movement alteration on interaction and awareness with digital embodiments

Collaborative tabletop systems can employ direct touch, where people's real arms and hands manipulate objects, or indirect input, where people are represented on the table with digital embodiments. The input type and the resulting embodiment dramatically influence tabletop interaction: in particular, the touch avoidance that naturally governs people's touching and crossing behavior with physical arms is lost with digital embodiments. One result of this loss is that people are less aware of each others' arms, and less able to coordinate actions and protect personal territories. To determine whether there are strategies that can influence group interaction on shared digital tabletops, we studied augmented digital arm embodiments that provide tactile feedback or movement alterations when people touched or crossed arms. The study showed that both augmentation types changed people's behavior (people crossed less than half as often) and also changed their perception (people felt more aware of the other person's arm, and felt more awkward when touching). This work shows how groupware designers can influence people's interaction, awareness, and coordination abilities when physical constraints are absent.

[1]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Direct intentions: the effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[2]  Joe Marshall,et al.  Uncomfortable interactions , 2012, CHI.

[3]  R. Heslin,et al.  The meanings of touch: sex differences. , 1975, The Journal of communication.

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Perceptibility and utility of sticky targets , 2008, Graphics Interface.

[5]  R. Heslin,et al.  Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person , 1983 .

[6]  E. M. de Korte,et al.  Effects of a feedback signal in a computer mouse on movement behaviour, muscle load, productivity, comfort and user friendliness , 2008, Ergonomics.

[7]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Planning and the user interface: the effects of lockout time and error recovery cost , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  Meeting people vitually: experiments in shared virtual environments , 2002 .

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance , 1978 .

[10]  Kris Luyten,et al.  Focus+Roles: Socio-Organizational Conflict Resolution in Collaborative User Interfaces , 2007, HCI.

[11]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Individual and Group Support in Tabletop Interaction Techniques , 2010, Tabletops.

[12]  Ravi Rastogi,et al.  An improved, low-cost tactile 'mouse' for use by individuals who are blind and visually impaired , 2009, Assets '09.

[13]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness , 1998, CSCW '98.

[14]  Jonathan Back,et al.  Locked-out: investigating the effectiveness of system lockouts to reduce errors in routine tasks , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware , 2007, GI '07.

[16]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  An Evaluation of Techniques for Reducing Spatial Interference in Single Display Groupware , 2005, ECSCW.

[17]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Avoiding interference: how people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[18]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input , 2008, CSCW.

[19]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware , 2008, Graphics Interface.

[20]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Interpersonal Touch: Expressing and Recognizing Emotions Through Haptic Devices , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media , 2003, UIST '03.

[22]  Bernard Horan,et al.  Supporting flexible roles in a shared space , 1998, CSCW '98.

[23]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Sometimes When We Touch : How Arm Embodiments Change Reaching and Coordination on Digital Tables , 2014 .

[24]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[25]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication , 2003, GROUP '03.

[26]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Navigating the Virtual Landscape: Coordinating the Shared Use of Space , 2003, Designing Information Spaces.

[27]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Mediating Group Dynamics through Tabletop Interface Design , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware , 2004, CSCW.

[29]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open-plan offices , 2007, GROUP.

[30]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  An evaluation of coordination techniques for protecting objects and territories in tabletop groupware , 2009, CHI.

[31]  Eytan Adar,et al.  Benefitting InfoVis with Visual Difficulties , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[32]  Marisa E. Campbell CSCW 2004 , 2004, INTR.

[33]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[34]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Real time groupware as a distributed system: concurrency control and its effect on the interface , 1994, CSCW '94.

[35]  S. Jourard,et al.  An exploratory study of body-accessibility. , 1966, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[36]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Hard lessons: effort-inducing interfaces benefit spatial learning , 2007, CHI.

[37]  S. Thayer,et al.  History and strategies of research on social touch , 1986 .

[38]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Communicating with Feeling , 2000, Haptic Human-Computer Interaction.

[39]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  The social life of avatars: presence and interaction in shared virtual environments , 2002 .

[40]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[41]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  VideoArms: Embodiments for Mixed Presence Groupware , 2007 .

[42]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Sometimes when we touch: how arm embodiments change reaching and collaboration on digital tables , 2013, CSCW.

[43]  John C. Tang,et al.  Three's company: understanding communication channels in three-way distributed collaboration , 2010, CSCW '10.