A Simplified Fourwall Interference Assessment Procedure for Airfoil Data Obtained in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel

SUMMARY A simplified fourwall interference assessment method has been described, and a computer program developed to facilitate correction of the airfoil data obtained in the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel (TCT). The procedure adopted is to first apply a blockage correction due to sidewall boundary- layer effects by various methods. layer corrected data are then used to calculate the top and bottom wall interference effects by the method of Capallier, Chevallier and Bouinol, using the measured wall pressure distribution and the model force coefficients. The inter- ference corrections obtained by the present method have been compared with other methods and found to give good agreement for the experimental data obtained in the TCT with slotted top and bottom walls. The sidewall boundary- INTRODUCTION Wall interference is a problem of concern in testing of airfoils in wind tunnels, particularly at transonic speeds. This is largely due to the complex flow features at the ventilated walls introducing uncertainties in the boundary conditions. Therefore, modern wall interference calculation methods, in lieu of the classicaL boundary conditions, use experimentally measured values of the pressure and/or flow inclinations at the wall to correct the test data.

[1]  E. J. Ray,et al.  Studies of sidewall boundary layer in the Langley 0.3 meter transonic cryogenic tunnel with and without suction , 1983 .

[3]  J. B. Adcock,et al.  Combined four-wall interference assessment in two-dimensional airfoil tests , 1983 .

[4]  Egon Stanewsky,et al.  Sidewall Effects on Airfoil Tests. , 1984 .

[5]  E. Murman A CORRECTION METHOD FOR TRANSONIC WIND TUNNEL WALL INTERFERENCE , 1979 .

[6]  E. Stanewsky,et al.  Investigation of sidewall boundary layer removal effects on two different chord airfoil models in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel , 1984 .

[7]  A. V. Murthy Effect of aspect ratio on sidewall boundary-layer influence in two-dimensional airfoil testing , 1987 .

[8]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Validation of a wall-interference assessment/correction procedure for airfoil tests in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel , 1984 .

[9]  R. V. Jenkins,et al.  Tables for correcting airfoil data obtained in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel for sidewall boundary-layer effects , 1986 .

[10]  R. W. Barnwell,et al.  A similarity rule for compressibility and sidewall-boundary-layer effects in two-dimensional wind tunnels , 1979 .

[11]  R. Gopinath Wall interference evaluation from pressure measurements on control surfaces , 1982 .

[12]  Richard W. Barnwell,et al.  Similarity Rule for Sidewall Boundary Layer Effect in Two-Dimensional Wind Tunnels , 1980 .

[13]  L. Ohman,et al.  Application of the fast Fourier transform to two-dimensional wind tunnel wall interference , 1980 .

[14]  J. Smith A method for determining 2D wall interference on an aerofoil from measured pressure distributions near the walls and on the model , 1981 .

[15]  R. W. Barnwell,et al.  Design and Performance Evaluation of Slotted Walls for Two-Dimensional Wind Tunnels , 1978 .

[16]  E. J. Ray,et al.  Investigation of the effects of upstream sidewall boundary-layer removal on a supercritical airfoil , 1983 .

[17]  J. Smith Measured boundary conditions methods for 2D flow , 1982 .

[18]  W. B. Kemp Transonic assessment of two-dimensional wind tunnel wall interference using measured wall pressures , 1978 .