Types and sources of fatal and severe non-fatal accidents in industrial maintenance

Abstract Due to the various work phases in disassembly and assembly, coupled with, for example, the pressure of time and working in close contact with machinery, industrial maintenance operations include several occupational risks. This article presents the results of an analysis based on real accident data. The data consisted of public Finnish accident reports describing fatal and severe non-fatal accidents in Finnish industry. The examination was limited to those accidents that involved full-time maintenance workers executing industrial maintenance operations. In the case of fatal accidents, the examination included the reports that were published during the years 1985–2004. The analysis of severe non-fatal accidents included the publication years 1994–2004. The accident types as well as their sources were examined in the light of Reason's theory on organizational accidents. During the reference periods, a total of 37 maintenance workers died in 33 accident cases. The respective number of victims among severe non-fatal accidents is 90. The findings indicate that the most typical accident types in both fatal and severe non-fatal accidents are crushing, falling, and accidents involving falling objects. The most frequently identified unsafe act leading to fatal accidents is dangerous working method (including conscious risk-taking), while the severe non-fatal accidents occur most often due to working at a running process. Within both types of accidents the most typical latent causes are defects in work instructions and machinery safety equipment. Based on the findings, the most essential roles in accident prevention are played by organizational factors, such as safety management and operations planning. Relevance to industry Analyzing accidents creates a basis for more effective safety and risk management, which can be expected to face new challenges as more and more maintenance operations become subcontracted. It also provides valuable information regarding machine and process design, and the planning of maintenance operations.

[1]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Skills, rules and knowledge in aircraft maintenance: errors in context , 2002, Ergonomics.

[2]  E. Brown After The Event , 2007 .

[3]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Towards the incorporation of flexibility, maintenance and safety in process design , 1995 .

[4]  Mattias Holmgren,et al.  Maintenance‐related losses at the Swedish Rail , 2005 .

[5]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[6]  Simon Bennett Managing Maintenance Error: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[7]  Young-Do Jo,et al.  Dynamic management of human error to reduce total risk , 2003 .

[8]  Urban Kjellen,et al.  Prevention of accidents through experience feedback , 2000 .

[9]  Andrew Hale,et al.  After the Event: From Accident to Organisational Learning , 1998 .

[10]  James C. Taylor,et al.  The evolution and effectiveness of Maintenance Resource Management (MRM) , 2000 .

[11]  Takashi Toriizuka,et al.  Application of performance shaping factor (PSF) for work improvement in industrial plant maintenance tasks , 2001 .

[12]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[13]  Salla Lind,et al.  Utilization of external accident information in companies’ safety promotion – Case: Finnish metal and transportation industry , 2008 .

[14]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[15]  John A. McDermid,et al.  A systematic approach to safety case maintenance , 1999, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Industry differences in accident causation , 1996 .

[17]  Pranab Kumar Nag,et al.  Work accidents among shiftworkers in industry , 1998 .

[18]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Human error in maintenance: a review , 2006 .

[19]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[20]  Pjm Peter Sonnemans,et al.  Accidents: A discrepancy between indicators and facts! , 2008 .

[21]  Robert Sargent,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process , 2000 .

[22]  Richard G. Little,et al.  The role of organizational culture and values in the performance of critical infrastructure systems , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[23]  Kunihide Sasou,et al.  Team errors: definition and taxonomy , 1999 .

[24]  Byung Yong Jeong Comparisons of variables between fatal and nonfatal accidents in manufacturing industry , 1999 .

[25]  Sheue-Ling Hwang,et al.  Knowledge architecture and framework design for preventing human error in maintenance tasks , 2000 .

[26]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Risk + barriers = safety? , 2008 .

[27]  Michael Baram Shame, Blame and Liability , 1997 .

[28]  H. Harvey Cohen,et al.  Accidents in the trucking industry , 1997 .