Self awareness and personality change in dementia

Background: Loss of insight is a core diagnostic criterion for frontotemporal dementia (FTD), whereas failure to recognise cognitive deficits and unawareness of disease (anosognosia) are well established findings in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, self awareness of personality has not been quantified in these patient groups. Methods: Twenty two patients (12 with frontal variant FTD; 10 with early AD) and 11 older adult normal controls completed self report questionnaires (the Interpersonal Adjectives Scales) describing their current personality. First degree relative informants completed two questionnaires, one describing the subject’s current personality, the other retrospectively describing the subject’s personality before disease onset. Differences between subject and informant reports of current personality were used to measure the accuracy of self awareness. Results: Discriminant function analysis showed significant differences in self awareness among the three groups, with those in the FTD group showing the greatest magnitude of error in the largest number of personality dimensions (dominance, submissiveness, cold heartedness, introversion, and ingenuousness). Despite personality changes over time, patients with AD showed accurate self awareness in all personality dimensions except submissiveness and extraversion. Normal controls showed a pattern of underestimating positive qualities, whereas patients with FTD exaggerated positive qualities and minimised negative qualities. For the personality facets showing impaired insight, the self reports of patients with FTD and AD most closely matched their premorbid personalities, suggesting a failure to update their self image after disease onset. Conclusions: This study operationalises research criteria for loss of insight in FTD.

[1]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  P. Gorelick,et al.  Personality changes in Alzheimer's disease. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[4]  M. Pasupathi,et al.  Concordance between observers in descriptions of personality change in Alzheimer's disease. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[5]  A. Heyman,et al.  Relationship Between Level of Insight and Severity of Dementia in Alzheimer Disease , 1995 .

[6]  M. Orrell,et al.  CAN FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BE DIFFERENTIATED USING A BRIEF BATTERY OF TESTS? , 1997, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[8]  J. E. Kurtz,et al.  Internal and Temporal Reliability Estimates for Informant Ratings of Personality Using the NEO PI-R and IAS , 1999, Assessment.

[9]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.

[10]  J. Heinik,et al.  Agreement between spouses and children in descriptions of personality change in Alzheimer's disease. , 1999, The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences.

[11]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[12]  G. Winocur,et al.  In Search of the Self: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1999 .

[13]  B Miller,et al.  Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick's Disease. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[14]  K. Zilles,et al.  Mind Reading: Neural Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Self-Perspective , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  K. Boone,et al.  Neuroanatomy of the self: Evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia , 2001 .

[16]  H. Rosen,et al.  Novel Applications of Social-Personality Measures to the Study of Dementia. , 2001, Neurocase.

[17]  J R Hodges,et al.  The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia , 2002, Neurology.

[18]  B L Miller,et al.  Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia , 2002, Neurology.

[19]  et al.,et al.  Discrimination between Alzheimer Dementia and Controls by Automated Analysis of Multicenter FDG PET , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Morris,et al.  Functional deactivations: Change with age and dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  A. Abu-Akel A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[22]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Introduction to the special section on social neuroscience: promise and caveats. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Cinguloparietal atrophy distinguishes Alzheimer disease from semantic dementia. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[25]  Joel H Kramer,et al.  Double dissociation of social functioning in frontotemporal dementia , 2003, Neurology.

[26]  Jesús Pujol,et al.  Alexithymia correlates with the size of the right anterior cingulate. , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.

[27]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.