Open Education and Open Science for our Global Society During and After the COVID-19 Outbreak

peer-reviewed and selected for publication and presentation at OE Global Conference 2020) Open Education and Open Science are global movements increasingly gaining interest and awareness since the COVID-19 outbreak. These two concepts, which can be traced back to the Middle Ages for Open Science and even earlier for Open Education, bear the potential to support our global society in particular during the current COVID-19 emergency and to build more open and global futures for science and education. Open Education is more a broad movement than a precise concept and discipline as shown by the key dimensions of Open Education that have been analysed and integrated into the OpenEd Quality Framework. Several studies revealed the constant changes in the understanding and implementations of Open Education through the centuries. Specific emphasis of Open Education is on the requirement and need to provide innovative pedagogical models and learning opportunities. To improve the learning quality through Open Education, the learners as well as the educators have to change their traditional strategies and views: Educators should facilitate learner-centred education and learners need to build and enhance key competences including strategies for self-regulated learning processes and media literacy. These change requests are strongly increasing when educators and learners are starting with

[1]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  A Holistic Pedagogical Model for STEM Learning and Education Inside and Outside the Classroom , 2020, HCI.

[2]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis , 2020 .

[3]  C. Stracke Open Science and Radical Solutions for Diversity, Equity and Quality in Research: A Literature Review of Different Research Schools, Philosophies and Frameworks and Their Potential Impact on Science and Education , 2020, Radical Solutions and Open Science.

[4]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[5]  D. Burgos,et al.  Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs , 2019, Open Praxis.

[6]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Evolution of MOOC designs, providers and learners and the related MOOC research and publications from 2008 to 2018 , 2019 .

[7]  F. Lisdat,et al.  A Holistic Pedagogical Model for STEM education in schools: Its Design and Evaluation through Mixed Methods Research with Surveys and Interviews , 2019 .

[8]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  The Quality Reference Framework for MOOC Design , 2019, EC-TEL.

[9]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education , 2019, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

[10]  Greg McVerry,et al.  Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education , 2019 .

[11]  O. Ebba Ecologies of Openness : Reformations through Open Pedagogy , 2019 .

[12]  Bryan G. Cook,et al.  Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education , 2018, Exceptional Children.

[13]  Ruben Vicente-Saez,et al.  Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[14]  Cleo Sgouropoulou,et al.  Gap between MOOC Designers' and MOOC Learners' Perspectives on Interaction and Experiences in MOOCs: Findings from the Global MOOC Quality Survey , 2018, 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[15]  S. Vazire Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  The Quality of Open Online Learning and Education: Towards a Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs , 2018, ICLS.

[17]  R. Sharma Innovative Applications of Online Pedagogy and Course Design , 2018 .

[18]  Christian M. Stracke Como a Educação Aberta pode melhorar a qualidade de aprendizagem e produzir impacto em alunos, organizações e na sociedade? , 2018 .

[19]  Cleo Sgouropoulou,et al.  Quality Reference Framework (QRF) for the Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) : Developed by MOOQ in close collaboration with all interested parties worldwide , 2018 .

[20]  María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya,et al.  Co-creación e innovación abierta: Revisión sistemática de literatura , 2018 .

[21]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Toward a More Perfect Psychology: Improving Trust, Accuracy, and Transparency in Research. , 2017 .

[22]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[23]  N. Pitrelli,et al.  Open Science training and education: challenges and difficulties on the researchers' side and in public engagement , 2015 .

[24]  Alan Tait,et al.  Framework of Quality Assurance of TEL Integration into an Educational Organization , 2014 .

[25]  Anne Gaskell,et al.  The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: what are the challenges? , 2014 .

[26]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  Evaluation Framework EFI for Measuring the Impact of Learning, Education and Training , 2014 .

[27]  Benedikt Fecher,et al.  Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought , 2013 .

[28]  C. Borgman The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Elena Barberà,et al.  SYSTEMIC MULTICULTURAL MODEL FOR ONLINE EDUCATION: Tracing Connections among Learner Inputs, Instructional Processes, and Outcomes , 2011 .

[30]  M. Peters,et al.  Virtues of Openness: Education, Science, and Scholarship in the Digital Age , 2011 .

[31]  Michael A. Peters,et al.  The History and Emergent Paradigm of Open Education , 2008 .

[32]  Alistair Inglis,et al.  Quality Improvement, Quality Assurance, and Benchmarking: Comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning , 2005 .

[33]  Paul A. David,et al.  Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist economics in historical context , 2004 .

[34]  David Nyberg,et al.  The philosophy of open education , 1976 .