An LMI-based decoupling control for electromagnetic formation flight

Abstract Electromagnetic formation flight (EMFF) leverages electromagnetic force to control the relative position of satellites. EMFF offers a promising alternative to traditional propellant-based spacecraft flight formation. This novel strategy is very attractive since it does not consume fuel. Due to the highly coupled nonlinearity of electromagnetic force, it is difficult to individually design a controller for one satellite without considering others, which poses challenges to communications. This paper is devoted to decoupling control of EMFF, including regulations, constraints and controller design. A learning-based adaptive sliding mode decoupling controller is analyzed to illustrate the problem of existing results, and input rate saturation is introduced to guarantee the validity of frequency division technique. Through transformation, the imposed input rate saturation is converted to state and input constraints. A linear matrix inequalities (LMI)-based robust optimal control method can then be used and improved to solve the transformed problem. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed decoupling control.

[1]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[2]  David W. Miller,et al.  Control of Electromagnetic Satellite Formations in Near-Earth Orbits , 2010 .

[3]  E. Kong Spacecraft formation flight exploiting potential fields , 2002 .

[4]  David W. Miller,et al.  Electromagnetic formation flight for sparse aperture telescopes , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  Mark A. Nurge,et al.  Alternating Magnetic Field Forces for Satellite Formation Flying , 2013 .

[6]  Dmitry V. Balandin,et al.  LMI based multi-objective control under multiple integral and output constraints , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[7]  Carsten W. Scherer,et al.  Robust generalized asymptotic regulation against non-stationary sinusoidal disturbances with uncertain frequencies , 2011 .

[8]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Stabilization of a Pitch Axis Flight Control Experiment with Input Rate Saturation , 1997 .

[9]  Carsten W. Scherer,et al.  Scheduled control for robust attenuation of non-stationary sinusoidal disturbances with measurable frequencies , 2011, Autom..

[11]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  Electromagnetic Formation Flight for Multisatellite Arrays , 2004 .

[12]  Gnana R. Kotamraju,et al.  Velocity-Free Attitude Controllers Subject to Actuator Magnitude and Rate Saturations , 2005 .

[13]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Indirect adaptive control for systems with input rate saturation , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[14]  Ramirez Riberos,et al.  New decentralized algorithms for spacecraft formation control based on a cyclic approach , 2010 .

[15]  Young-Hun Lim,et al.  Decentralized control of nonlinear interconnected systems under both amplitude and rate saturations , 2013, Autom..

[16]  Ye Xudong,et al.  Nonlinear Adaptive Learning Control With Disturbance of Unknown Periods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  Electromagnetic formation flight dynamics including reaction wheel gyroscopic stiffening effects , 2007 .

[18]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  Explicit Dipole Trajectory Solution for Electromagnetically Controlled Spacecraft Clusters , 2010 .