Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear. METHODS We randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2‐negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease‐free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival. RESULTS The result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease‐free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Overall survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (89.2% vs. 83.6% of the patients were alive at 5 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among patients with triple‐negative disease, the rate of disease‐free survival was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87), and the overall survival rate was 78.8% versus 70.3% (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90). The hand‐foot syndrome, the most common adverse reaction to capecitabine, occurred in 73.4% of the patients in the capecitabine group. CONCLUSIONS After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease‐free survival and overall survival among patients with HER2‐negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease on pathological testing. (Funded by the Advanced Clinical Research Organization and the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group; CREATE‐X UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000000843.)

[1]  A. Lluch,et al.  Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel Followed by Capecitabine As Adjuvant Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results From the GEICAM/2003-10 Study. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Paik,et al.  Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  E. Perez,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up of the E1199 Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Taxane and Schedule in Operable Breast Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  H. Koeppen,et al.  Patients with Slowly Proliferative Early Breast Cancer Have Low Five-Year Recurrence Rates in a Phase III Adjuvant Trial of Capecitabine , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  R. Gelber,et al.  Tailoring therapies—improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015 , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  D. Shin,et al.  Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[8]  H. Iwata,et al.  Prognostic significance of subtype and pathologic response in operable breast cancer; a pooled analysis of prospective neoadjuvant studies of JBCRG , 2015, Breast Cancer.

[9]  H. Sasano,et al.  Randomized trial of preoperative docetaxel with or without capecitabine after 4 cycles of 5-fluorouracil–epirubicin–cyclophosphamide (FEC) in early-stage breast cancer: exploratory analyses identify Ki67 as a predictive biomarker for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  F.–C. Zhang,et al.  Capecitabine for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer: efficacy, safety and ethnicity , 2012, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[11]  V. Georgoulias,et al.  A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  Y. Bang,et al.  Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[13]  V. Kataja,et al.  Adjuvant capecitabine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin for early breast cancer: final analysis of the randomized FinXX trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  田村 隆行 Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium に参加して , 2011 .

[15]  E. Perez,et al.  Phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer: SWOG 0012. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Andreas Schneeweiss,et al.  Intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide compared with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer: mature results of an AGO phase III study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Rezai,et al.  Capecitabine in addition to anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer: phase III GeparQuattro study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Potential regional differences for the tolerability profiles of fluoropyrimidines. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Berger,et al.  Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  高橋 聡,et al.  Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0による胃癌術後合併症の解析 , 2006 .

[22]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Issues in the assessment of the pathologic effect of primary systemic therapy for breast cancer , 2006, Breast cancer.

[23]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Markus Abt,et al.  Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  H. Iwata,et al.  Interim analysis of a phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by docetaxel as preoperative chemotherapy for early stage breast carcinoma , 2005, Breast cancer.

[26]  M. Toi,et al.  Thymidine phosphorylase (platelet-derived endothelial-cell growth factor) in cancer biology and treatment. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  David Miles,et al.  Combination versus sequential single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, The oncologist.

[28]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[29]  C. Leichman Schedule dependency of 5-fluorouracil. , 1999, Oncology.

[30]  A. Buzdar,et al.  Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  B. Reigner,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[33]  K. Sugimachi,et al.  Postoperative adjuvant randomised trial comparing chemoendocrine therapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with stage II breast cancer: 5-year results from the Nishinihon Cooperative Study Group of Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer (ACETBC) of Japan. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[34]  D L DeMets,et al.  Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  T. Taguchi,et al.  [A comparative study of 5'-DFUR and tegafur in recurrent breast cancer]. , 1985, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[36]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Nomograms for calculating the number of patients needed for a clinical trial with survival as an endpoint. , 1982, Biometrics.