Towards Grounded Enterprise Modelling

This paper is concerned with the concept of grounding enterprise models in terms of an underlying fact-based model, as a way to add more meaning to these enterprise models. We motivate the need for doing so in terms of a fundamental understanding of conceptual modelling, and enterprise modelling in particular. We also clarify why, next to e.g. adding more meaning by using formal semantics, or mapping the model to a foundational ontology, it remains important to ground enterprise models on fact-based models that capture the natural way in which people converse about/in their domain. The presented concepts are illustrated by means of a running example, while also reflecting on, and summarising, the results of earlier experiments in grounding different enterprise models.

[1]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Freezing language : conceptualisation processes across ICT-supported organisations , 2003 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Erratum to: Information System Concepts , 2017 .

[3]  Patrick van Bommel,et al.  Object-Oriented Modelling Based on Logbooks , 1996, Comput. J..

[4]  Jeff Rothenberg,et al.  The nature of modeling , 1989 .

[5]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Understanding the Requirements on Modelling Techniques , 2005, CAiSE.

[6]  Sybren de Kinderen,et al.  Can boundary objects mitigate communication defects in enterprise transformation? Findings from expert interviews , 2013, EMISA.

[7]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  The Theory of Conceptual Models, the Theory of Conceptual Modelling and Foundations of Conceptual Modelling , 2011, Handbook of Conceptual Modeling.

[8]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede,et al.  How to formalize it?: Formalization principles for information system development methods , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Enhancing the System Dynamics Modeling Process with a Domain Modeling Method , 2013, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[11]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Integrating System Dynamics with Object-Role Modeling , 2008, PoEM.

[12]  Iman Tohidian,et al.  Examining Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis as One of the Main Views on the Relationship Between Language and Thought , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  ArchiMate 2.0 Specification: The Open Group , 2012 .

[14]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  On Ontology, ontologies, Conceptualizations, Modeling Languages, and (Meta)Models , 2007, DB&IS.

[15]  Rodrigo Magalhães,et al.  Model-enabled design and engineering of organisations and their enterprises , 2017, Organizational Design and Enterprise Engineering.

[16]  Marija Bjekovic,et al.  Enterprise Modelling Languages - Just Enough Standardisation? , 2013, BMSD.

[17]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling , 2005, ER.

[18]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  A Fact-Oriented Approach to Activity Modeling , 2005, OTM Workshops.

[19]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  On the use of Object-Role Modelling to Model Active Domains , 2006, EMMSAD.

[20]  Marija Bjekovic,et al.  A Framework for Natural Enterprise Modelling , 2013, 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics.

[21]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  EVORM: A Conceptual Modelling Technique for Evolving Application Domains , 1994, Data Knowl. Eng..

[22]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[23]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS — Architecture of Integrated Information Systems , 1992 .

[24]  Henk Jonkers,et al.  The Anatomy of the ArchiMate Language , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[25]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow Patterns , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.