Perceptual differences of enterprise resource planning systems between management and operational end-users

This article seeks to explore the perceptions of two different user groups – management and operational end-users – on enterprise resource planning (ERP) system product performance and post-implementation impact of usage on them. One hundred and sixty-seven management and operational end-users from 15 manufacturing firms operating in Sri Lanka responded. Over 88% of the respondents came from firms that employed more than 500 employees; 68% responded that more than 200 employees are using ERP in their firms; and 70% responded that ERP is in use for more than 3 years in their firms. Significant differences have not been found between the two groups in their perceptions towards ERP system product performance. However, problem-solving support, authority and decision rights and overall performance improvement have been identified as important post-implementation outcomes of ERP usage that discriminate between management and operational end-users.

[1]  Francis A. Wilson,et al.  Managerial control strategies within the networked organization , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[2]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  A multiple-case design methodology for studying MRP success and CSFs , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  ERP in the minds of supervisors: Joint roles of task interdependence and cultural norms , 2006 .

[4]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note , 2003 .

[6]  James Ang,et al.  User information satisfaction, job satisfaction and computer background: An exploratory study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems as a technology of power: empowerment or panoptic control? , 2002, DATB.

[8]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Executive Information Systems: Their Impact on Executive Decision Making , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Middle management downsizing: an empirical investigation of the impact of information technology , 1997 .

[11]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Assessing Expert Systems Impact on Users' Jobs , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Sue Newell,et al.  Critical Success Factors , 2005, ICEIS.

[13]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[14]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  Behavioral research opportunities: Understanding the impact of enterprise systems , 2006, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  ERP architectural/operational alignment for order‐processing performance , 2004 .

[16]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Measuring enterprise systems success: the importance of a multiple stakeholder perspective , 2004, ECIS.

[17]  R McLeanEphraim,et al.  Measuring information systems performance: experience with the management by results system at Security Pacific Bank , 1988 .

[18]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[19]  R. Anthony,et al.  Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .

[20]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[21]  Peter Ellis,et al.  Office planning and design: the impact of organizational change due to advanced information technology , 1984 .

[22]  Thomas W. Ferratt,et al.  Information technology use by managers in Greece to support decision making: Amount, perceived value, and satisfaction , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[25]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  Measuring ERP success: the ultimate users' view , 2006 .

[26]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Qing Hu,et al.  Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A structural contingency theory perspective , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  F. Mann,et al.  Observations on the Dynamics of a Change to Electronic Data-Processing Equipment , 1960 .

[31]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Identifying and evaluating the importance of multiple stakeholder perspective in measuring ES-success , 2006, ECIS.

[32]  Jesse Dillard,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems and Communicative Action , 2006 .

[33]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Classifying the Benefits of ERP Systems , 2000 .

[34]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  J. Stalnaker Results from Factor Analysis , 1940 .

[36]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, CONTROL AND POWER: THE CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE REVISITED* , 1992 .

[37]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Yuan Sun,et al.  Extending technology usage to work settings: The role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[39]  G. Spreitzer PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[40]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Structural Sources of Intraorganizational: Power: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1984 .

[41]  W. E. Riggs,et al.  Critical Success Factors in Manufacturing Resource Planning Implementation , 1991 .

[42]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Information Systems Effectiveness: A User Satisfaction Approach , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[46]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Factors important to expert systems success a field test , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[47]  John A. A. Sillince,et al.  Divisive and integrative political strategies in the IS adaptation process: the MAC initiative , 1998 .

[48]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross‐functionality , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model , 2003, ICIS.

[51]  C. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  HR, ERP, and knowledge for competitive advantage , 2006 .

[52]  William J. Doll,et al.  Research Report - A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[54]  Nazmun Nahar,et al.  Prioritization of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems success measures: viewpoints of two organizational stakeholder groups , 2006, SAC.

[55]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[56]  H. Barki Determinants of user satisfaction judgements in information systems , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  Shih-Wen Chien,et al.  Investigating the success of ERP systems: Case studies in three Taiwanese high-tech industries , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[58]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[59]  V. Murray,et al.  Illusions and Other Games: A Trifocal View of Organizational Politics , 1991 .

[60]  Damian O'Doherty,et al.  Transformative Capacity, Information Technology, and the Making of Business ‘Experts’ , 2007 .

[61]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  S. Koh,et al.  ERP II: The involvement, benefits and impediments of collaborative information sharing , 2008 .

[63]  M. Zviran,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction in an outsourcing environment , 1997 .

[64]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[65]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: Replication within an ERP Domain , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[66]  G. Sewell The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .