On the evaluation of application level delays in public LoRaWAN networks

The Internet of Things paradigm aims to connect a very large number of smart objects located all around the world for increasing the knowledge about the environment. Low-power wireless communications are compulsory to reduce the smart object invasiveness and ensure reasonable duration of autonomous node. For this reason, several Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) technologies have been proposed in the recent past, because of their large range and low consumption. Most notably, the LoRaWAN solution emerged as the most accepted LPWAN and several research works appeared, discussing its advantages and limitations. However, very few, if any, discuss timing performance in a real scenario, considering not only the wireless frontend but also the wired backend. In this work, the authors implement a real use case based on a public LoRaWAN infrastructure and propose metrics to formally evaluate the delays at the application level (i.e. considering the whole infrastructure as a black box). The result is an average delay in the range 400-700 ms, and the proof that the delay is directly dependent on both the LoRaWAN backend and the connection speed of information endpoints.

[1]  Florian Hammer,et al.  Towards End-to-End Latency of LoRaWAN: Experimental Analysis and IIoT Applicability , 2019, 2019 15th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS).

[2]  A. Flammini,et al.  On the feasibility of mobile sensing and tracking applications based on LPWAN , 2018, 2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[3]  Emiliano Sisinni,et al.  A Test Bench for Evaluating Communication Delays in LoRaWAnapplications , 2018, 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT.

[4]  François Delobel,et al.  Analysis of the Delay of Confirmed Downlink Frames in Class B of LoRaWAN , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[5]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Dong Min Kim,et al.  Analysis of Latency and MAC-Layer Performance for Class A LoRaWAN , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[7]  Judah Levine,et al.  Usage Analysis of the NIST Internet Time Service. , 2016, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[8]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Comparison of the Device Lifetime in Wireless Networks for the Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Access.

[9]  Mahesh Sooriyabandara,et al.  Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Xiaohu You,et al.  Narrowband Wireless Access for Low-Power Massive Internet of Things: A Bandwidth Perspective , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[11]  Song Han,et al.  Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Emiliano Sisinni,et al.  Delay Estimation of Industrial IoT Applications Based on Messaging Protocols , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Understanding the Limits of LoRaWAN , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.