In-clinic use of electronic pain diaries: barriers of implementation among pain physicians.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine barriers to the use of electronic diaries within the clinic setting and determine outcome differences between patients who used electronic diaries to monitor their progress with summary data feedback and patients who monitored their progress with paper diaries without summary data feedback. METHODS One hundred thirty-four (n=134) chronic pain patients were asked to monitor their pain, mood, activity interference, medication use, and pain location on either a paper or electronic diary immediately before each monthly clinic visit for 10 months. Patients and their treating physicians in the electronic diary group (n=67) were able to observe changes in their ratings whereas patients using the paper diaries (n=67) had no feedback about their data entry. RESULTS Most participants believed that completing pain diaries was beneficial; yet, only 23% of patients in the experimental condition felt that the data from the electronic diaries improved their care and less than 15% believed that their doctor made a change in their treatment based on the summary diary information. CONCLUSION In general, treating physicians were positive about the use of electronic diaries, although they admitted that they did not regularly incorporate the summary data in their treatment decision making because either they forgot or they were too busy. Future studies in understanding barriers to physicians' and patients' use of diary data to impact treatment outcome are needed to improve care for persons with chronic pain.

[1]  M. Hupli,et al.  Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. , 1993, The Clinical journal of pain.

[2]  Nathaniel P. Katz,et al.  Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers , 2002, PAIN.

[3]  S. Simoens,et al.  Job Satisfaction, Work-Related Stress and Intentions to Quit of Scottish GPS , 2002, Scottish medical journal.

[4]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. , 1994, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[5]  David H. Goldstein,et al.  Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[6]  Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: An analysis from ecological momentary assessment. , 2002 .

[7]  B. Parasuraman,et al.  Electronic Versus Paper Questionnaires: A Further Comparison in Persons with Asthma , 2003, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[8]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases , 1983, Pain.

[9]  A. Cook,et al.  Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment , 2004, Pain.

[10]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Examining scale discriminability in the BDI and CES-D as a function of depressive severity. , 1995 .

[11]  D. Fairchild,et al.  Disease management for chronic pain: barriers of program implementation with primary care physicians. , 2002, Pain medicine.

[12]  Hamish Macleod,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Measurement of Mood Change , 1997 .

[13]  A. Gray,et al.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK , 1999, Pain.

[14]  D L Patrick,et al.  Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). , 1994, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  C. May,et al.  Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory , 2009 .

[16]  M. Irwin,et al.  Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis , 2006, European journal of pain.

[18]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.

[19]  J. Bensing,et al.  Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain , 2000, PAIN®.

[20]  Johannes,et al.  Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[21]  A. Bandura.  Behavior theory and the models of man. , 1974 .

[22]  L. Radloff.  The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[23]  Huong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Internet-based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research , 2004, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[24]  T. Kvien,et al.  Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  R. Jamison,et al.  Treatment helpfulness questionnaire: a measure of patient satisfaction with treatment modalities provided in chronic pain management programs , 1996, Pain.

[26]  J. Baird,et al.  Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. , 2006, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[27]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Implementation Science Development of a Theory of Implementation and Integration: Normalization Process Theory , 2022 .

[28]  Joseph E. Schwartz,et al.  Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction , 2003, Pain.

[29]  R. McFall,et al.  Some determinants of self-monitoring effects. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[30]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for Use in Documenting the Outcomes of Patients With Noncancer Pain , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[31]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[32]  Sarah Carolan,et al.  Electronic diaries as a tool to improve pain management: is there any evidence? , 2007, Pain medicine.

[33]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[34]  Scott R. Bishop,et al.  The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. , 1995 .

[35]  C. Taylor,et al.  A Palmtop Computer Program for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder , 1999, Behavior modification.

[36]  D. Turk,et al.  Comparison of the Redundancy, Reliability, and Responsiveness to Change Among SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[37]  Donna L Berry,et al.  Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. , 2003, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[38]  J. L. Dahl,et al.  Pain management, controlled substances, and state medical board policy: a decade of change. , 2002, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[39]  C. B. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of delivery methods of cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder: an international multicenter trial. , 2003, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[40]  M. Oken,et al.  Physician knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a survey from the Minnesota cancer pain project. , 1995, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[41]  Stephen Taplin,et al.  In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  R. Jamison,et al.  Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study , 2001, Pain.