Protecting quantum coherence of two-level atoms from vacuum fluctuations of electromagnetic field

In the framework of open quantum systems, we study the dynamics of a static polarizable two-level atom interacting with a bath of fluctuating vacuum electromagnetic field and explore under which conditions the coherence of the open quantum system is unaffected by the environment totally. For both a single-qubit and two-qubit systems, we find that the quantum coherence can not be protected from noise when the atom interacts with a non-boundary electromagnetic field. However, with the presence of a boundary, the dynamical conditions for the insusceptible of quantum coherence are fulfilled only when the atom is close to the boundary and is transversely polarizable. Otherwise, the quantum coherence can only be protected in some degree in other polarizable direction.

[1]  Loudon,et al.  Spontaneous emission in the optical microscopic cavity. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[2]  Fabio Benatti,et al.  Environment induced entanglement in Markovian dissipative dynamics. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[3]  Zehua Tian,et al.  How the Unruh effect affects transition between classical and quantum decoherences , 2012, 1203.6141.

[4]  G. Lindblad On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[5]  Hongwei Yu,et al.  Detecting modified vacuum fluctuations due to presence of a boundary by means of the geometric phase , 2012 .

[6]  M. Plenio,et al.  Quantifying coherence. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[7]  Jieci Wang,et al.  Quantum decoherence in noninertial frames , 2010, 1005.2865.

[8]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[9]  M. Scully,et al.  Radiation pattern of a classical dipole in a cavity , 1991 .

[10]  J. Åberg Catalytic coherence. , 2013, Physical Review Letters.

[11]  Horodecki Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems , 1976 .

[13]  David Jennings,et al.  Description of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[15]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[16]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Frozen quantum coherence. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[17]  Franco Nori,et al.  Witnessing Quantum Coherence: from solid-state to biological systems , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Anthony J Leggett,et al.  Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement (Progress in Statistical and Solid State Physics--In Commemoration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ryogo Kubo) -- (Statistical Physics) , 1980 .

[19]  Lorenzo Maccone,et al.  Using entanglement against noise in quantum metrology. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit , 2004, Science.

[21]  Some remarks on quantum coherence , 1994, hep-th/9402062.

[22]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , 2002 .

[23]  Meschede,et al.  Radiative properties of atoms near a conducting plane: An old problem in a new light. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[24]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[25]  R. Glauber Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field , 1963 .

[26]  Scully,et al.  Enhancement of the index of refraction via quantum coherence. , 1991, Physical review letters.