Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric joint inversion

The growing use of the controlled-source electromagnetic method (CSEM) and magnetotellurics (MT) for exploration applications has been driving the development of data acquisition technologies, and three-dimensional (3-D) modeling and imaging techniques. However, targeting increasingly complex geological environments also further enhances the problems inherent in large-scale inversion, such as non-uniqueness and resolution issues. In this paper, we report on two techniques to mitigate these problems. We use 3-D joint CSEM and MT inversion to improve the model resolution. To avoid the suppression of the resolution capacities of one data type, and thus to balance the use of inherent, and ideally complementary information content, different data reweighting schemes are proposed. Further, a hybrid model parameterization approach is presented, where traditional cell-based model parameters are used simultaneously within a parametric inversion. The idea is to limit the non-uniqueness problem, typical for 3-D imaging problems, in order to allow for a more focusing inversion. The methods are demonstrated using synthetic data generated from models with a strong practical relevance.

[1]  B Kirkendall,et al.  Electromagnetic Imaging of CO2 Sequestration at an Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Site , 2001 .

[2]  Steven Constable,et al.  Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts , 2004 .

[3]  Don White.  Geophysical Monitoring In the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring And Storage Project , 2008 .

[4]  Frank Morrison,et al.  Sharp boundary inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data , 1999 .

[5]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems : Electromagnetic characterization of buried obstacles , 2004 .

[6]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Solution strategies for two- and three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems , 2000 .

[7]  David Lumley,et al.  Seismic monitoring of CO2 geo-sequestration: realistic capabilities and limitations , 2008 .

[8]  A. Hördt,et al.  A joint application of radiomagnetotellurics and transient electromagnetics to the investigation of a waste deposit in Cologne (Germany) , 1996 .

[9]  Michael Commer,et al.  New advances in three‐dimensional controlled‐source electromagnetic inversion , 2007 .

[10]  Diego Rovetta,et al.  Probabilistic joint inversion of TD-CSEM, MT and DC data for hydrocarbon exploration , 2008 .

[11]  G. Michael Hoversten,et al.  Marine magnetotellurics for base-of-salt mapping : Gulf of Mexico field test at the Gemini structure , 2000 .

[12]  J. Shadid,et al.  Three‐dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers , 1996 .

[13]  M. Meju,et al.  Joint inversion of TEM and distorted MT soundings, Some effective practical considerations , 1996 .

[14]  William Rodi,et al.  Joint 3D Inversion of Marine CSEM And MT Data , 2007 .

[15]  Michael Commer,et al.  New results on the resistivity structure of Merapi Volcano (Indonesia), derived from three-dimensional restricted inversion of long-offset transient electromagnetic data , 2006 .

[16]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Solution Accelerators For Large-scale 3D Electromagnetic Inverse Problems , 2004 .

[17]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Chapter 8 Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling and inversion: Application to sub-salt imaging , 2002 .

[18]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three‐dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion—I. Theory , 1997 .

[19]  G. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients , 2000 .